From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: danielmentz@google.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, will.deacon@arm.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "lib/genalloc.c: start search from start of chunk" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 09:36:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <147937181723339@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
lib/genalloc.c: start search from start of chunk
to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
lib-genalloc.c-start-search-from-start-of-chunk.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 62e931fac45b17c2a42549389879411572f75804 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Mentz <danielmentz@google.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 17:46:59 -0700
Subject: lib/genalloc.c: start search from start of chunk
From: Daniel Mentz <danielmentz@google.com>
commit 62e931fac45b17c2a42549389879411572f75804 upstream.
gen_pool_alloc_algo() iterates over the chunks of a pool trying to find
a contiguous block of memory that satisfies the allocation request.
The shortcut
if (size > atomic_read(&chunk->avail))
continue;
makes the loop skip over chunks that do not have enough bytes left to
fulfill the request. There are two situations, though, where an
allocation might still fail:
(1) The available memory is not contiguous, i.e. the request cannot
be fulfilled due to external fragmentation.
(2) A race condition. Another thread runs the same code concurrently
and is quicker to grab the available memory.
In those situations, the loop calls pool->algo() to search the entire
chunk, and pool->algo() returns some value that is >= end_bit to
indicate that the search failed. This return value is then assigned to
start_bit. The variables start_bit and end_bit describe the range that
should be searched, and this range should be reset for every chunk that
is searched. Today, the code fails to reset start_bit to 0. As a
result, prefixes of subsequent chunks are ignored. Memory allocations
might fail even though there is plenty of room left in these prefixes of
those other chunks.
Fixes: 7f184275aa30 ("lib, Make gen_pool memory allocator lockless")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1477420604-28918-1-git-send-email-danielmentz@google.com
Signed-off-by: Daniel Mentz <danielmentz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
lib/genalloc.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/lib/genalloc.c
+++ b/lib/genalloc.c
@@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ unsigned long gen_pool_alloc(struct gen_
struct gen_pool_chunk *chunk;
unsigned long addr = 0;
int order = pool->min_alloc_order;
- int nbits, start_bit = 0, end_bit, remain;
+ int nbits, start_bit, end_bit, remain;
#ifndef CONFIG_ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG
BUG_ON(in_nmi());
@@ -288,6 +288,7 @@ unsigned long gen_pool_alloc(struct gen_
if (size > atomic_read(&chunk->avail))
continue;
+ start_bit = 0;
end_bit = chunk_size(chunk) >> order;
retry:
start_bit = pool->algo(chunk->bits, end_bit, start_bit, nbits,
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from danielmentz@google.com are
queue-4.4/lib-genalloc.c-start-search-from-start-of-chunk.patch
reply other threads:[~2016-11-17 8:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=147937181723339@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=danielmentz@google.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.