From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: CK Hu Subject: Re: DRM: urgent v4.9-rc6 build regression: master build: 2 failures 1 warnings (v4.9-rc5-213-g961b708) Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 00:46:06 +0800 Message-ID: <1479401166.30632.14.camel@mtksdaap41> References: <3658238.UlO2HTojHV@wuerfel> <3081141.oCXXbHYFFj@wuerfel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Return-path: Received: from mailgw01.mediatek.com (unknown [210.61.82.183]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE0BE6E821 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 16:46:11 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <3081141.oCXXbHYFFj@wuerfel> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, kernel-build-reports@lists.linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Mark Brown List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org SGksIEFybmQ6CgpJJ3ZlIG1hZGUgYSBtaXN0YWtlIHRoYXQgSSd2ZSB0cmllZCB0byBidWlsZCB0 aGVzZSBwYXRjaGVzIG9uIHY0LjktcmMxLApidXQgSSBkb2VzIG5vdCBzZXQgQ09ORklHX0RSTV9N RURJQVRFSz15LCB0aGVyZWZvcmUgSSBkaWRuJ3QgZmluZCBvdXQKdGhlc2UgYnVpbGQgZmFpbHMu IE5vdyBJIGZpeCB0aGUgY29uZmlnIHByb2JsZW0sIGFuZCBJIHRoaW5rIEkgc2hvdWxkCmJ1aWxk IHRoZXNlIHBhdGNoZXMgb24gbGF0ZXN0IGtlcm5lbCB2ZXJzaW9uIGV2ZW4gdGhvdWdoIHBhdGNo J3Mgb3duZXIKdGVzdCBvbiBvbGQga2VybmVsIHZlcnNpb24uIEkgd2lzaCB0aGlzIGZsb3cgd291 bGQgbWFrZSB0aGluZ3MgYmV0dGVyLgoKSXQncyBvayB0aGF0IHlvdSBqdXN0IHJldmVydCB0aGVz ZSB0d28gcGF0Y2hlcy4gSSd2ZSBmaXhlZCBidWlsZCBmYWlsCmFuZCB3aWxsIHJlcXVlc3QgcHVs bCBsYXRlci4KClJlZ2FyZHMsCkNLCgpPbiBUaHUsIDIwMTYtMTEtMTcgYXQgMTY6MjQgKzAxMDAs IEFybmQgQmVyZ21hbm4gd3JvdGU6Cj4gT24gVGh1cnNkYXksIE5vdmVtYmVyIDE3LCAyMDE2IDg6 NTA6MDUgUE0gQ0VUIERhdmUgQWlybGllIHdyb3RlOgo+ID4gCj4gPiBBcm5kIGNvdWxkIHlvdSBz ZW5kIGEgZ2l0IHB1bGwgd2l0aCB0aGUgdHdvIHJldmVydHMsIHdpdGggbXkgQWNrZWQtYnkgb24K PiA+IGl0PyBJIHdvbid0IGJlIGluIGEgcGxhY2UgdG8gZG8gaXQgZm9yIDgtOWhycy4KPiAKPiBJ IGRvbid0IHRoaW5rIGl0J3MgdGhhdCB1cmdlbnQsIGFzIGxvbmcgYXMgd2UgbWFrZSBzdXJlIGl0 J3MgZml4ZWQgaW4gdGhlCj4gbmV4dCAtcmMuIEkndmUgc2VudCBvdXQgdGhlIHJldmVydHMgYXMg cGF0Y2hlcyB3aXRoIGEgbGl0dGxlIG1vcmUgaW5mb3JtYXRpb24KPiBpbiB0aGUgY2hhbmdlbG9n OiBpdCB0dXJucyBvdXQgdGhhdCB0aGV5IGFyZSBhY3R1YWxseSBicm9rZW4gb24gbGludXgtbmV4 dCB0b28sCj4gdGhleSBoYWQganVzdCBub3QgbWFkZSBpdCBpbiB0aGVyZSwgYW5kIG9uZSBvZiB0 aGUgdHdvIGFjdHVhbGx5IGRpZCBidWlsZAo+IG9uIG9sZGVyIGtlcm5lbHMuCj4gCj4gSSB0aGlu ayB3aGF0IGhhcHBlbmVkIGhlcmUgaXMgdGhhdCB0aGUgZml4ZXMgd2VyZSB0ZXN0ZWQgb24gYSB2 NC40IGtlcm5lbAo+IGFuZCBibGluZGx5IGZvcndhcmQtcG9ydGVkLiBJdCBwcm9iYWJseSBtYWtl cyBzZW5zZSB0byBsb29rIGF0IHRoZQo+IGVudGlyZSBzZXJpZXMgYWdhaW4gaW4gY2FzZSBhbm90 aGVyIG9uZSBvZiB0aGVtIGlzIGJyb2tlbi4KPiAKPiBQaGlsaXBwLCBIdSwgQmliYnksIGNvdWxk IG9uZSBvZiB5b3UgaGF2ZSBhbm90aGVyIGxvb2s/Cj4gCj4gCUFybmQKCgpfX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXwpkcmktZGV2ZWwgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0 CmRyaS1kZXZlbEBsaXN0cy5mcmVlZGVza3RvcC5vcmcKaHR0cHM6Ly9saXN0cy5mcmVlZGVza3Rv cC5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9kcmktZGV2ZWwK From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933193AbcKQRBX (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Nov 2016 12:01:23 -0500 Received: from mailgw01.mediatek.com ([210.61.82.183]:24839 "EHLO mailgw01.mediatek.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754069AbcKQRBT (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Nov 2016 12:01:19 -0500 Message-ID: <1479401166.30632.14.camel@mtksdaap41> Subject: Re: DRM: urgent v4.9-rc6 build regression: master build: 2 failures 1 warnings (v4.9-rc5-213-g961b708) From: CK Hu To: Arnd Bergmann CC: , Dave Airlie , , Mark Brown , , , Philipp Zabel , Bibby Hsieh Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 00:46:06 +0800 In-Reply-To: <3081141.oCXXbHYFFj@wuerfel> References: <3658238.UlO2HTojHV@wuerfel> <3081141.oCXXbHYFFj@wuerfel> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MTK: N Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Arnd: I've made a mistake that I've tried to build these patches on v4.9-rc1, but I does not set CONFIG_DRM_MEDIATEK=y, therefore I didn't find out these build fails. Now I fix the config problem, and I think I should build these patches on latest kernel version even though patch's owner test on old kernel version. I wish this flow would make things better. It's ok that you just revert these two patches. I've fixed build fail and will request pull later. Regards, CK On Thu, 2016-11-17 at 16:24 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday, November 17, 2016 8:50:05 PM CET Dave Airlie wrote: > > > > Arnd could you send a git pull with the two reverts, with my Acked-by on > > it? I won't be in a place to do it for 8-9hrs. > > I don't think it's that urgent, as long as we make sure it's fixed in the > next -rc. I've sent out the reverts as patches with a little more information > in the changelog: it turns out that they are actually broken on linux-next too, > they had just not made it in there, and one of the two actually did build > on older kernels. > > I think what happened here is that the fixes were tested on a v4.4 kernel > and blindly forward-ported. It probably makes sense to look at the > entire series again in case another one of them is broken. > > Philipp, Hu, Bibby, could one of you have another look? > > Arnd