From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Andrew Zaborowski <andrew.zaborowski@intel.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3][RFC] nl80211/mac80211: Accept multiple RSSI thresholds for CQM
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 15:47:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1480344479.8107.60.camel@sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1478398113-14966-4-git-send-email-andrew.zaborowski@intel.com> (sfid-20161106_030854_712830_960200F6)
> + * @set_cqm_rssi_range_config: Configure two RSSI thresholds in the
> > + * connection quality monitor. Even if the driver implements both the
> > + * single threshold and low/high thresholds mechanisms, it should assume
> + * only one is active at any time.
Why would a driver still (be allowed to!) implement both?
> + int (*set_cqm_rssi_range_config)(struct wiphy *wiphy,
> + struct net_device *dev,
> + s32 rssi_low, s32 rssi_high);
Seems there still should be a hysteresis? Or am I misunderstanding the
intent here? I.e. isn't it meant to report low/medium/high later?
> diff --git a/include/net/mac80211.h b/include/net/mac80211.h
> index 33026e1..7da1056 100644
> --- a/include/net/mac80211.h
> +++ b/include/net/mac80211.h
I'd prefer you split cfg80211 and mac80211 patches, i.e. provide the
new API first and then implement it in mac80211 separately.
> +void cfg80211_cqm_config_free(struct wireless_dev *wdev)
> +{
> + if (!wdev->cqm_config)
> + return;
> +
> + kfree(wdev->cqm_config->rssi_thresholds);
> + kfree(wdev->cqm_config);
> + wdev->cqm_config = NULL;
> +}
You can save this complexity by just making the cqm_config struct have
all the thresholds inside itself - pretty easy to allocate by just
counting them first.
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-28 14:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-06 2:08 [PATCH 0/3][RFC] CQM RSSI event with many thresholds Andrew Zaborowski
2016-11-06 2:08 ` [PATCH 1/3][RFC] mac80211: Pass new RSSI level in CQM RSSI notification Andrew Zaborowski
2016-11-06 2:08 ` [PATCH 2/3][RFC] cfg80211: " Andrew Zaborowski
2016-11-06 2:08 ` [PATCH 3/3][RFC] nl80211/mac80211: Accept multiple RSSI thresholds for CQM Andrew Zaborowski
2016-11-28 14:47 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2016-11-28 15:29 ` Andrew Zaborowski
2016-11-28 15:35 ` Johannes Berg
2016-11-28 18:06 ` Andrew Zaborowski
2016-12-13 16:11 ` Johannes Berg
2016-12-18 0:18 ` Andrew Zaborowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1480344479.8107.60.camel@sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=andrew.zaborowski@intel.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.