From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
rui.zhang@intel.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "thermal/powerclamp: add back module device table" has been added to the 4.8-stable tree
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 16:34:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <14804336988378@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
thermal/powerclamp: add back module device table
to the 4.8-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
thermal-powerclamp-add-back-module-device-table.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.8 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From ec638db8cb9ddd5ca08b23f2835b6c9c15eb616d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 11:08:45 -0800
Subject: thermal/powerclamp: add back module device table
From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
commit ec638db8cb9ddd5ca08b23f2835b6c9c15eb616d upstream.
Commit 3105f234e0aba43e44e277c20f9b32ee8add43d4 replaced module
cpu id table with a cpu feature check, which is logically correct.
But we need the module device table to allow module auto loading.
Fixes:3105f234 thermal/powerclamp: correct cpu support check
Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/intel_powerclamp.c
@@ -669,9 +669,16 @@ static struct thermal_cooling_device_ops
.set_cur_state = powerclamp_set_cur_state,
};
+static const struct x86_cpu_id __initconst intel_powerclamp_ids[] = {
+ { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, X86_FAMILY_ANY, X86_MODEL_ANY, X86_FEATURE_MWAIT },
+ {}
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(x86cpu, intel_powerclamp_ids);
+
static int __init powerclamp_probe(void)
{
- if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_MWAIT)) {
+
+ if (!x86_match_cpu(intel_powerclamp_ids)) {
pr_err("CPU does not support MWAIT");
return -ENODEV;
}
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com are
queue-4.8/thermal-powerclamp-add-back-module-device-table.patch
reply other threads:[~2016-11-29 15:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=14804336988378@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.