From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 5723DE00503; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 09:19:09 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [209.85.210.194 listed in list.dnswl.org] * 0.5 RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM RBL: SORBS: sender is a spam source * [209.85.210.194 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from mail-wj0-f194.google.com (mail-wj0-f194.google.com [209.85.210.194]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBEEBE00498 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 09:19:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wj0-f194.google.com with SMTP id kp2so23248496wjc.0 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 09:19:06 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=q+T8S6g92ospRbgfU0pKPxGhXMWzrnLhqYfbTK9KnyI=; b=FgrM/Lm9Pg4AxdaoTlEIG6aMT8ZbJTOlZckmdY1sLAiR5gsbSRYooTxgtKOZRmdPeR FA4Ar13TBhS9brw4E5gJLBygW5IPOUuD93NGkX7BM2xmn/V3jVPiSJeoPk12kkWTfVTN V6aY60rEnH4pJRcStxdO8Y+j+zVSkhiZBSuUUuWlewfM1f2xdIlb9uzx4RFwoY/8O+/Q ls7bCqspcLnmaggs87urOhiyLdmt98wimXeSp0tfQc6W39wqv0QqD7/Lm4b/Vh/ua/aC Kd5PjGw4KE2SDybZE5W3m+1FRFti8Gd0FRTB6fp2EGyR3/WOnYRrMupLNsOoObP/WBmB zeSA== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC03ULfqbW5zTNP2YfvpryoT/8boKUwV9i20ncH4reBEKoDf9mHHHRewu661Xgc6v6w== X-Received: by 10.194.26.170 with SMTP id m10mr29324465wjg.152.1480526345566; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 09:19:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from tfsielt31850 ([77.107.218.170]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a13sm8996571wma.18.2016.11.30.09.19.04 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 30 Nov 2016 09:19:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1480526344.13682.8.camel@andred.net> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9?= Draszik To: Patrick Ohly Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 17:19:04 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1480517999.6873.298.camel@intel.com> References: <20161121120355.18309-1-git@andred.net> <1480503859.6873.280.camel@intel.com> <1480516308.13682.1.camel@andred.net> <1480517999.6873.298.camel@intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.2-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: update mechanisms (was: Re: [meta-swupd][PATCH] bsdiff: update to latest version) X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 17:19:09 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Wed, 2016-11-30 at 15:59 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: > On Wed, 2016-11-30 at 14:31 +0000, André Draszik wrote: > > On Wed, 2016-11-30 at 12:04 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > > On Mon, 2016-11-21 at 12:03 +0000, André Draszik wrote: > > > > This allows us to completely remove the build time > > > > depenency on libcheck when not needed, reducing > > > > overall build time, and in addition tests can be > > > > converted into a PACKAGECONFIG to enable them if > > > > needed. > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > Sorry for the delay, I had to check with Joshua first who's going to > > > merge your patches. I'm currently working on a major update of > > > meta-swupd (see https://github.com/ostroproject/ostro-os/pull/198) and > > > if there's enough interest for using it as part of Yocto, might > > > continue > > > maintaining it. > > > > Thanks Patrick. Are you saying you would otherwise abandon meta-swupd > > completely, or have it be a part of ostro-os only? > > That's undecided. We are currently trying to figure out which update > mechanism is a good fit for Yocto. Depending on the outcome of that and > available resources, we may or may not have the time to support > something. > > I've started a Wiki page > https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/System_Update - rudimentary at the > moment, but might as well be mentioned already now. > > Perhaps you can say a few words about your usage of swupd and what you > liked or didn't like about it? Note that performance will become better > with the upcoming update. In the wiki or here? I'll be out for the next week, but when I come back I will write some more. BTW, you probably know this: https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/automotive-discussions/2016-May/002061.html I liked swupd for its ability to be used both for initial provisioning as well as for incremental updates. The latter being important when you have *loads* of devices, where it doesn't seem to make sense to download a full image for a tiny change to each device (think cellular!), the former streamlining the update mechanism, so that not two different independent things have to be maintained. Cheers, Andre'