From: Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Greg Kurz <gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.8] spapr: fix default DRC state for coldplugged LMBs
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 17:05:34 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1480547134-18590-1-git-send-email-mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
Currently we set the initial isolation/allocation state for DRCs
associated with coldplugged LMBs to ISOLATED/UNUSABLE,
respectively, under the assumption that the guest will move this
state to UNISOLATED/USABLE.
In fact, this is only the case for LMBs added via hotplug. For
coldplugged LMBs, the guest actually assumes the initial state to
be UNISOLATED/USABLE.
In practice, this only becomes an issue when we attempt to unplug
one of these LMBs, where the guest kernel will issue an
rtas-get-sensor-state call to check that the corresponding DRC is
in an USABLE state before it will release the LMB back to
QEMU. If the returned state is otherwise, the guest will assume no
further action is needed, which bypasses the QEMU-side cleanup that
occurs during the USABLE->UNUSABLE transition. This results in
LMBs and their corresponding pc-dimm devices to stick around
indefinitely.
This patch fixes the issue by manually setting DRCs associated with
cold-plugged LMBs to UNISOLATED/ALLOCATED, but leaving the hotplug
state untouched. As it turns out, this is analogous to the handling
for cold-plugged CPUs in spapr_core_plug().
Cc: qemu-ppc@nongnu.org
Cc: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Greg Kurz <gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
This patch is a revision to the previously posted series:
[PATCH for-2.8 0/3] spapr: fix breakage of memory unplug after migration
That patchset introduced DRC migration as a means to address DRC state
synchronization between source/target to allow memory unplug after
migration. It turns out that unplug was also not working for LMBs
that were defined on the source via '-device pc-dimm'. The real issue
was that the default coldplug state on *both* the source and target was
wrong, and by fixing that default state, we no longer need DRC migration
for the scenario mentioned in the previous patchset since, incidentally,
coldplug state on the target now matches post-hotplug DRC state on the
source.
This patch is very late for 2.8, but I'm hoping it can still make it
in for rc3/2.8.
I've tested forward/backward migration for all possible combinations
(other than known case unsupported case 2.8->2.7) of
v2.6/v2.7/v2.8, pseries-2.6/pseries-2.7/pseries-2.8, and
modern-hotplug-events=true/false, with various combinations of
CPU / LMB hotplug/unplug before/after migration.
---
hw/ppc/spapr.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
index c3269c7..208ef7b 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
@@ -2290,6 +2290,11 @@ static void spapr_add_lmbs(DeviceState *dev, uint64_t addr_start, uint64_t size,
drck = SPAPR_DR_CONNECTOR_GET_CLASS(drc);
drck->attach(drc, dev, fdt, fdt_offset, !dev->hotplugged, errp);
addr += SPAPR_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE;
+ if (!dev->hotplugged) {
+ /* guests expect coldplugged LMBs to be pre-allocated */
+ drck->set_allocation_state(drc, SPAPR_DR_ALLOCATION_STATE_USABLE);
+ drck->set_isolation_state(drc, SPAPR_DR_ISOLATION_STATE_UNISOLATED);
+ }
}
/* send hotplug notification to the
* guest only in case of hotplugged memory
--
1.9.1
next reply other threads:[~2016-11-30 23:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-30 23:05 Michael Roth [this message]
2016-12-01 2:41 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.8] spapr: fix default DRC state for coldplugged LMBs David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1480547134-18590-1-git-send-email-mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.