From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DE0C71BD8; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 15:54:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Dec 2016 07:54:21 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,287,1477983600"; d="scan'208";a="793506923" Received: from swold-mobl2.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.255.68.21]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Dec 2016 07:54:21 -0800 Message-ID: <1480694061.30023.78.camel@linux.intel.com> From: Saul Wold To: Khem Raj , openembeded-devel , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 07:54:21 -0800 In-Reply-To: References: <20161128225759.9756-1-raj.khem@gmail.com> <8632C69E-1C6B-482D-AF15-965F55F0AF88@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [meta-oe][PATCH] libva: Import from meta-intel and update to 1.7.3 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 15:54:20 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 11:58 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 9:19 AM, Burton, Ross > wrote: > > > > On 1 December 2016 at 03:42, Khem Raj wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If libva goes in, can we get libva-intel-driver in as well? > > > > > Those go > > > > > hand-in-glove currently. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Khem, does the AMD BSP use that?  I'd have thought that bit was > > > > actually > > > > meta-intel specific. > > > > > > its intel BSPs specific > > > > > > So I'd endorse libva for oe-core, and the intel-driver remains in > > meta-intel. > > I am fine with proposal. This is time for someone to raise > objections. > As meta-intel maintainer I am OK with this, makes more sense than going into meta-oe. Please be sure to include meta-intel@yoctoproject.org for this. I'm wondering if we should also move the gstreamer-vaapi-1.0 recipe to oe-core to be with it's brethren? Sau! > > > > > > Ross > > -- > > _______________________________________________ > > Openembedded-devel mailing list > > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DE0C71BD8; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 15:54:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Dec 2016 07:54:21 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,287,1477983600"; d="scan'208";a="793506923" Received: from swold-mobl2.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.255.68.21]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Dec 2016 07:54:21 -0800 Message-ID: <1480694061.30023.78.camel@linux.intel.com> From: Saul Wold To: Khem Raj , openembeded-devel , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 07:54:21 -0800 In-Reply-To: References: <20161128225759.9756-1-raj.khem@gmail.com> <8632C69E-1C6B-482D-AF15-965F55F0AF88@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] libva: Import from meta-intel and update to 1.7.3 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 15:54:20 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 11:58 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 9:19 AM, Burton, Ross > wrote: > > > > On 1 December 2016 at 03:42, Khem Raj wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If libva goes in, can we get libva-intel-driver in as well? > > > > > Those go > > > > > hand-in-glove currently. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Khem, does the AMD BSP use that?  I'd have thought that bit was > > > > actually > > > > meta-intel specific. > > > > > > its intel BSPs specific > > > > > > So I'd endorse libva for oe-core, and the intel-driver remains in > > meta-intel. > > I am fine with proposal. This is time for someone to raise > objections. > As meta-intel maintainer I am OK with this, makes more sense than going into meta-oe. Please be sure to include meta-intel@yoctoproject.org for this. I'm wondering if we should also move the gstreamer-vaapi-1.0 recipe to oe-core to be with it's brethren? Sau! > > > > > > Ross > > -- > > _______________________________________________ > > Openembedded-devel mailing list > > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel