From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: tiwai@suse.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, ddiss@suse.de,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, minchan@kernel.org,
sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "zram: fix unbalanced idr management at hot removal" has been added to the 4.8-stable tree
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 18:11:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1480698696136169@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
zram: fix unbalanced idr management at hot removal
to the 4.8-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
zram-fix-unbalanced-idr-management-at-hot-removal.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.8 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 529e71e16403830ae0d737a66c55c5f360f3576b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 15:54:08 -0800
Subject: zram: fix unbalanced idr management at hot removal
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
commit 529e71e16403830ae0d737a66c55c5f360f3576b upstream.
The zram hot removal code calls idr_remove() even when zram_remove()
returns an error (typically -EBUSY). This results in a leftover at the
device release, eventually leading to a crash when the module is
reloaded.
As described in the bug report below, the following procedure would
cause an Oops with zram:
- provision three zram devices via modprobe zram num_devices=3
- configure a size for each device
+ echo "1G" > /sys/block/$zram_name/disksize
- mkfs and mount zram0 only
- attempt to hot remove all three devices
+ echo 2 > /sys/class/zram-control/hot_remove
+ echo 1 > /sys/class/zram-control/hot_remove
+ echo 0 > /sys/class/zram-control/hot_remove
- zram0 removal fails with EBUSY, as expected
- unmount zram0
- try zram0 hot remove again
+ echo 0 > /sys/class/zram-control/hot_remove
- fails with ENODEV (unexpected)
- unload zram kernel module
+ completes successfully
- zram0 device node still exists
- attempt to mount /dev/zram0
+ mount command is killed
+ following BUG is encountered
BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffffffa0002ba0
IP: get_disk+0x16/0x50
Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
CPU: 0 PID: 252 Comm: mount Not tainted 4.9.0-rc6 #176
Call Trace:
exact_lock+0xc/0x20
kobj_lookup+0xdc/0x160
get_gendisk+0x2f/0x110
__blkdev_get+0x10c/0x3c0
blkdev_get+0x19d/0x2e0
blkdev_open+0x56/0x70
do_dentry_open.isra.19+0x1ff/0x310
vfs_open+0x43/0x60
path_openat+0x2c9/0xf30
do_filp_open+0x79/0xd0
do_sys_open+0x114/0x1e0
SyS_open+0x19/0x20
entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x13/0x94
This patch adds the proper error check in hot_remove_store() not to call
idr_remove() unconditionally.
Fixes: 17ec4cd98578 ("zram: don't call idr_remove() from zram_remove()")
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1010970
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161121132140.12683-1-tiwai@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@suse.de>
Reported-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@suse.de>
Tested-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@suse.de>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
@@ -1403,7 +1403,8 @@ static ssize_t hot_remove_store(struct c
zram = idr_find(&zram_index_idr, dev_id);
if (zram) {
ret = zram_remove(zram);
- idr_remove(&zram_index_idr, dev_id);
+ if (!ret)
+ idr_remove(&zram_index_idr, dev_id);
} else {
ret = -ENODEV;
}
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from tiwai@suse.de are
queue-4.8/zram-fix-unbalanced-idr-management-at-hot-removal.patch
reply other threads:[~2016-12-02 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1480698696136169@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ddiss@suse.de \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.