All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <1480785308.4751.41.camel@redhat.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index eea5fe3..caadbd1 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -39,9 +39,9 @@ Linaro has a kernel patch which looks at the bit_width field of the
 port address:
 
 Author: Aleksey Makarov <aleksey.makarov@linaro.org>
-Date:   Thu Apr 28 19:52:38 2016 +0300
+Date:???Thu Apr 28 19:52:38 2016 +0300
 
-    serial: SPCR: check bit width for the 16550 UART
+????serial: SPCR: check bit width for the 16550 UART
 
 The SPCR in 3.06.25 firmware has a bit_width field set to 32 and with the
 above patch, I don't need to use console=. But HP firmware on m400 sets
@@ -51,8 +51,8 @@ bit width to 8 so that needs a firmware fix to work with above.
 > 
 > The earlycon preferred console will parse the SPCR and find:
 > 
->         iotype = table->serial_port.space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_MEMORY ?
->                         "mmio" : "io";
+> ????????iotype = table->serial_port.space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_MEMORY ?
+> ????????????????????????"mmio" : "io";
 > 
 > Which sets it to "mmio" (not "mmio32"). There is a DBG2 (the table
 > referenced by the SPCR that provides the actual port types for all
@@ -71,19 +71,19 @@ bit width to 8 so that needs a firmware fix to work with above.
 > There are a couple of possibilities:
 > 
 > 1). Perhaps (for some reason) the IP actually does support sub-32-bit
->     access and the iotype simply needs to be changed to reflect this.
->     That would be the easiest option. But it's been this way for a
->     long time in various codebases, so I would be pleasantly
->     surprised if this were the case. Let me/us know :)
+> ????access and the iotype simply needs to be changed to reflect this.
+> ????That would be the easiest option. But it's been this way for a
+> ????long time in various codebases, so I would be pleasantly
+> ????surprised if this were the case. Let me/us know :)
 > 
 > 2). We find some way during SPCR setup to quirk for X-Gene as a non
->     standard 16550 and set it up as an mmio32 iotype.
+> ????standard 16550 and set it up as an mmio32 iotype.
 > 
 > 3). We get the DBG2 table updated to add a subtype of the 16650
->     called something like "(deprecated) 16550 subset supporting
->     only 32-bit accesses". Then we add this to Linux and get
->     the firmware updated on systems to switch to this type. We
->     would probably still want to quirk for existing machines.
+> ????called something like "(deprecated) 16550 subset supporting
+> ????only 32-bit accesses". Then we add this to Linux and get
+> ????the firmware updated on systems to switch to this type. We
+> ????would probably still want to quirk for existing machines.
 > 
 > Perhaps I'm missing something. I would love for that to be true,
 > but I don't think it is. I think we need a subtype of the 16550
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index a6b9a25..25e9ccc 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -5,19 +5,10 @@
  "ref\0175F32B0-C73F-4250-9E60-3CE7409F0B0C@redhat.com\0"
  "ref\0CADaLNDmWRn+UKzF8PH2LmYCSF+NhHaw26RTN+QoaByh1wS7jfQ@mail.gmail.com\0"
  "ref\07fa523de-3fbb-1566-f521-927143f73d1e@redhat.com\0"
- "From\0Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>\0"
- "Subject\0Re: [SPCR] mmio32 iotype access requirements for X-Gene 8250(_dw) UART\0"
+ "From\0msalter@redhat.com (Mark Salter)\0"
+ "Subject\0[SPCR] mmio32 iotype access requirements for X-Gene 8250(_dw) UART\0"
  "Date\0Sat, 03 Dec 2016 12:15:08 -0500\0"
- "To\0Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>"
- " Duc Dang <dhdang@apm.com>\0"
- "Cc\0Rafael Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>"
-  Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
-  linux-arm <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
-  Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
-  patches <patches@apm.com>
-  Aleksey Makarov <aleksey.makarov@linaro.org>
-  linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
- " Grant Likely <grant.likely@hpe.com>\0"
+ "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On Sat, 2016-12-03 at 05:06 -0500, Jon Masters wrote:\n"
@@ -61,9 +52,9 @@
  "port address:\n"
  "\n"
  "Author: Aleksey Makarov <aleksey.makarov@linaro.org>\n"
- "Date:\302\240\302\240\302\240Thu Apr 28 19:52:38 2016 +0300\n"
+ "Date:???Thu Apr 28 19:52:38 2016 +0300\n"
  "\n"
- "\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240serial: SPCR: check bit width for the 16550 UART\n"
+ "????serial: SPCR: check bit width for the 16550 UART\n"
  "\n"
  "The SPCR in 3.06.25 firmware has a bit_width field set to 32 and with the\n"
  "above patch, I don't need to use console=. But HP firmware on m400 sets\n"
@@ -73,8 +64,8 @@
  "> \n"
  "> The earlycon preferred console will parse the SPCR and find:\n"
  "> \n"
- "> \302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240iotype = table->serial_port.space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_MEMORY ?\n"
- "> \302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\"mmio\" : \"io\";\n"
+ "> ????????iotype = table->serial_port.space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_MEMORY ?\n"
+ "> ????????????????????????\"mmio\" : \"io\";\n"
  "> \n"
  "> Which sets it to \"mmio\" (not \"mmio32\"). There is a DBG2 (the table\n"
  "> referenced by the SPCR that provides the actual port types for all\n"
@@ -93,19 +84,19 @@
  "> There are a couple of possibilities:\n"
  "> \n"
  "> 1). Perhaps (for some reason) the IP actually does support sub-32-bit\n"
- "> \302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240access and the iotype simply needs to be changed to reflect this.\n"
- "> \302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240That would be the easiest option. But it's been this way for a\n"
- "> \302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240long time in various codebases, so I would be pleasantly\n"
- "> \302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240surprised if this were the case. Let me/us know :)\n"
+ "> ????access and the iotype simply needs to be changed to reflect this.\n"
+ "> ????That would be the easiest option. But it's been this way for a\n"
+ "> ????long time in various codebases, so I would be pleasantly\n"
+ "> ????surprised if this were the case. Let me/us know :)\n"
  "> \n"
  "> 2). We find some way during SPCR setup to quirk for X-Gene as a non\n"
- "> \302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240standard 16550 and set it up as an mmio32 iotype.\n"
+ "> ????standard 16550 and set it up as an mmio32 iotype.\n"
  "> \n"
  "> 3). We get the DBG2 table updated to add a subtype of the 16650\n"
- "> \302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240called something like \"(deprecated) 16550 subset supporting\n"
- "> \302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240only 32-bit accesses\". Then we add this to Linux and get\n"
- "> \302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240the firmware updated on systems to switch to this type. We\n"
- "> \302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240would probably still want to quirk for existing machines.\n"
+ "> ????called something like \"(deprecated) 16550 subset supporting\n"
+ "> ????only 32-bit accesses\". Then we add this to Linux and get\n"
+ "> ????the firmware updated on systems to switch to this type. We\n"
+ "> ????would probably still want to quirk for existing machines.\n"
  "> \n"
  "> Perhaps I'm missing something. I would love for that to be true,\n"
  "> but I don't think it is. I think we need a subtype of the 16550\n"
@@ -120,4 +111,4 @@
  "> Jon.\n"
  >
 
-5f85b8f678c58b0629906bf9e52048fdb6eb521a9859022e5f200b0de3f5f318
+8fe89b57f920fa1de33109548648451b75fd8438f46631dd2aba8012b672710f

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.