From: James Bottomley <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: emilne@redhat.com, Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
Cc: Wei Fang <fangwei1@huawei.com>,
"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: avoid a permanent stop of the scsi device's request queue
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 10:16:05 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1481134565.2354.43.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1481132411.28416.232.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Wed, 2016-12-07 at 12:40 -0500, Ewan D. Milne wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-12-07 at 08:55 -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On 12/07/2016 08:48 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > > It's a known bug. Some time ago I posted a patch that serializes
> > > all scsi_device_set_state() calls but I have not yet found it in
> > > the list archives. However, that patch has not yet been merged.
> >
> > See also https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg66966.html.
> >
> > Bart.
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux
> > -scsi" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> Yes, however that patch does not fix Wei Fang's issue. In fact I
> just received a crash dump that appears to be the same thing. It
> looks like the rport went away right after the initial INQUIRY, so we
> set the state to SDEV_BLOCK and stop the queue, and then the scan
> code continues and sets the state back to SDEV_RUNNING.
So here's the violation of the state model. the rport went CREATED
->BLOCK which is wrong: it should go CREATED->CREATED_BLOCK and then
the add code would set it to BLOCK instead of RUNNING.
The question to diagnose is why CREATED->BLOCK worked.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-07 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-06 9:12 [PATCH] scsi: avoid a permanent stop of the scsi device's request queue Wei Fang
2016-12-06 15:51 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-12-07 1:20 ` Wei Fang
2016-12-07 2:45 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-12-07 3:41 ` Wei Fang
2016-12-07 4:40 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-12-07 6:59 ` Wei Fang
2016-12-07 16:48 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-12-07 16:55 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-12-07 17:40 ` Ewan D. Milne
2016-12-07 18:16 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2016-12-07 19:24 ` Ewan D. Milne
2016-12-07 20:09 ` James Bottomley
2016-12-07 20:30 ` Ewan D. Milne
2016-12-07 23:43 ` James Bottomley
2016-12-08 2:28 ` Wei Fang
2016-12-08 2:33 ` James Bottomley
2016-12-08 3:22 ` Wei Fang
2016-12-08 6:38 ` Wei Fang
2016-12-08 14:04 ` Ewan D. Milne
2016-12-08 15:39 ` James Bottomley
2016-12-09 1:08 ` Wei Fang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1481134565.2354.43.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
--cc=emilne@redhat.com \
--cc=fangwei1@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.