From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, subashab@codeaurora.org,
xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "netlink: Call cb->done from a worker thread" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2016 07:20:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <14811780203994@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
netlink: Call cb->done from a worker thread
to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
netlink-call-cb-done-from-a-worker-thread.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From foo@baz Thu Dec 8 07:18:57 CET 2016
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 19:22:12 +0800
Subject: netlink: Call cb->done from a worker thread
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
[ Upstream commit 707693c8a498697aa8db240b93eb76ec62e30892 ]
The cb->done interface expects to be called in process context.
This was broken by the netlink RCU conversion. This patch fixes
it by adding a worker struct to make the cb->done call where
necessary.
Fixes: 21e4902aea80 ("netlink: Lockless lookup with RCU grace...")
Reported-by: Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan <subashab@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Acked-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
net/netlink/af_netlink.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
net/netlink/af_netlink.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
+++ b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
@@ -924,14 +924,11 @@ static void netlink_skb_set_owner_r(stru
sk_mem_charge(sk, skb->truesize);
}
-static void netlink_sock_destruct(struct sock *sk)
+static void __netlink_sock_destruct(struct sock *sk)
{
struct netlink_sock *nlk = nlk_sk(sk);
if (nlk->cb_running) {
- if (nlk->cb.done)
- nlk->cb.done(&nlk->cb);
-
module_put(nlk->cb.module);
kfree_skb(nlk->cb.skb);
}
@@ -960,6 +957,28 @@ static void netlink_sock_destruct(struct
WARN_ON(nlk_sk(sk)->groups);
}
+static void netlink_sock_destruct_work(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+ struct netlink_sock *nlk = container_of(work, struct netlink_sock,
+ work);
+
+ nlk->cb.done(&nlk->cb);
+ __netlink_sock_destruct(&nlk->sk);
+}
+
+static void netlink_sock_destruct(struct sock *sk)
+{
+ struct netlink_sock *nlk = nlk_sk(sk);
+
+ if (nlk->cb_running && nlk->cb.done) {
+ INIT_WORK(&nlk->work, netlink_sock_destruct_work);
+ schedule_work(&nlk->work);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ __netlink_sock_destruct(sk);
+}
+
/* This lock without WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE is good on UP and it is _very_ bad on
* SMP. Look, when several writers sleep and reader wakes them up, all but one
* immediately hit write lock and grab all the cpus. Exclusive sleep solves
--- a/net/netlink/af_netlink.h
+++ b/net/netlink/af_netlink.h
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
#include <linux/rhashtable.h>
#include <linux/atomic.h>
+#include <linux/workqueue.h>
#include <net/sock.h>
#define NLGRPSZ(x) (ALIGN(x, sizeof(unsigned long) * 8) / 8)
@@ -53,6 +54,7 @@ struct netlink_sock {
struct rhash_head node;
struct rcu_head rcu;
+ struct work_struct work;
};
static inline struct netlink_sock *nlk_sk(struct sock *sk)
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from herbert@gondor.apana.org.au are
queue-4.4/netlink-do-not-schedule-work-from-sk_destruct.patch
queue-4.4/netlink-call-cb-done-from-a-worker-thread.patch
reply other threads:[~2016-12-08 6:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=14811780203994@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=subashab@codeaurora.org \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.