All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, subashab@codeaurora.org,
	xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "netlink: Call cb->done from a worker thread" has been added to the 4.8-stable tree
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2016 07:21:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <14811780641631@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    netlink: Call cb->done from a worker thread

to the 4.8-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     netlink-call-cb-done-from-a-worker-thread.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.8 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From foo@baz Thu Dec  8 07:19:12 CET 2016
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 19:22:12 +0800
Subject: netlink: Call cb->done from a worker thread

From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>


[ Upstream commit 707693c8a498697aa8db240b93eb76ec62e30892 ]

The cb->done interface expects to be called in process context.
This was broken by the netlink RCU conversion.  This patch fixes
it by adding a worker struct to make the cb->done call where
necessary.

Fixes: 21e4902aea80 ("netlink: Lockless lookup with RCU grace...")
Reported-by: Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan <subashab@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Acked-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 net/netlink/af_netlink.c |   27 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
 net/netlink/af_netlink.h |    2 ++
 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
+++ b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
@@ -322,14 +322,11 @@ static void netlink_skb_set_owner_r(stru
 	sk_mem_charge(sk, skb->truesize);
 }
 
-static void netlink_sock_destruct(struct sock *sk)
+static void __netlink_sock_destruct(struct sock *sk)
 {
 	struct netlink_sock *nlk = nlk_sk(sk);
 
 	if (nlk->cb_running) {
-		if (nlk->cb.done)
-			nlk->cb.done(&nlk->cb);
-
 		module_put(nlk->cb.module);
 		kfree_skb(nlk->cb.skb);
 	}
@@ -346,6 +343,28 @@ static void netlink_sock_destruct(struct
 	WARN_ON(nlk_sk(sk)->groups);
 }
 
+static void netlink_sock_destruct_work(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	struct netlink_sock *nlk = container_of(work, struct netlink_sock,
+						work);
+
+	nlk->cb.done(&nlk->cb);
+	__netlink_sock_destruct(&nlk->sk);
+}
+
+static void netlink_sock_destruct(struct sock *sk)
+{
+	struct netlink_sock *nlk = nlk_sk(sk);
+
+	if (nlk->cb_running && nlk->cb.done) {
+		INIT_WORK(&nlk->work, netlink_sock_destruct_work);
+		schedule_work(&nlk->work);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	__netlink_sock_destruct(sk);
+}
+
 /* This lock without WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE is good on UP and it is _very_ bad on
  * SMP. Look, when several writers sleep and reader wakes them up, all but one
  * immediately hit write lock and grab all the cpus. Exclusive sleep solves
--- a/net/netlink/af_netlink.h
+++ b/net/netlink/af_netlink.h
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
 
 #include <linux/rhashtable.h>
 #include <linux/atomic.h>
+#include <linux/workqueue.h>
 #include <net/sock.h>
 
 #define NLGRPSZ(x)	(ALIGN(x, sizeof(unsigned long) * 8) / 8)
@@ -33,6 +34,7 @@ struct netlink_sock {
 
 	struct rhash_head	node;
 	struct rcu_head		rcu;
+	struct work_struct	work;
 };
 
 static inline struct netlink_sock *nlk_sk(struct sock *sk)


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from herbert@gondor.apana.org.au are

queue-4.8/udplite-call-proper-backlog-handlers.patch
queue-4.8/netlink-do-not-schedule-work-from-sk_destruct.patch
queue-4.8/netlink-call-cb-done-from-a-worker-thread.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2016-12-08  6:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=14811780641631@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=subashab@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.