From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id B63A0E00D29; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 07:14:12 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [209.85.223.178 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-io0-f178.google.com (mail-io0-f178.google.com [209.85.223.178]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48E78E00D12 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 07:14:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-io0-f178.google.com with SMTP id d9so60896425ioe.0 for ; Fri, 09 Dec 2016 07:14:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gw2F9X4SAD4GR0GPJ3P/5MeMRGbDXFN0uxIecHfKh3E=; b=sr1UJeh3R6AZRdzPo/YzuD/7LdHerZVdenw7JkYc1mXxNiA2XKmZ+wvmMMb+RPkxth h5BTPr/b+wqOzxdZIuCmK3UcaEZPCfUo9jzydEL+q0Xbn2Ff5NyxTYmkeuVSUvtuyMn0 P03hX/McxEdYd2CKfZhkP5PNhn0x8y3aVXB9aCn1je2i8gtHtvIUrbN92JRCRsilqUNq 0BYLDmeDcsfghc1mqvrqF6zi+1B7jT/2WPtWVXeL7oUutY84hKrMD6ZB8/dUtzip+jlq R/RFrYtTCkrKvU8erMCpaxHg3zkRa78nRzAnv2fBEMl85bHgA8G6DktdaRwZpP7q7Rih gk6Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gw2F9X4SAD4GR0GPJ3P/5MeMRGbDXFN0uxIecHfKh3E=; b=jYRihdTSEG+vm37PSyWNgy6LqSx/R1+XRr/dVmQlr62Eyf3W3N4jMvoR9KcqYY2IqE G+CZaQVbhr6tZ8mtDu/T57sD/n1htMUz57S/PTWLOL8GMMnBbUIYjFSKb0RepTcGyE0a dY0wuA5LUvO35hdx07KoxJjVcHlmhXHLoeXA6B9pprbGtChLH2Rmjt4T19/zAlLMQRJ8 hsW98ubQ/auWV8yZYbKX3H92jt+a3zqsAL1NmPw39ro2gK2deGFWp8voAnCFmokcUKXO ruWzusr+zm7Z4gFOhN2x2Udgs3UrMW0tzxIQh0k2e2Rm0q0jTrDw858E/P66PfdCVsJE 6nVA== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC00HdI/O0xT4OGak/mR540MTtRhWUlimy7sqf2PcAhOigzt898v+wHOqmlrWGvSzhjQt X-Received: by 10.36.138.67 with SMTP id v64mr7079763itd.39.1481296437747; Fri, 09 Dec 2016 07:13:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from pohly-mobl1 (p57A56203.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [87.165.98.3]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l3sm7317482iti.3.2016.12.09.07.13.55 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 09 Dec 2016 07:13:56 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1481296433.17535.170.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: Stefano Babic , Kristian Amlie Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 16:13:53 +0100 In-Reply-To: <16ca1a50-f46a-196f-66b8-91f0d14f59c2@denx.de> References: <20161121120355.18309-1-git@andred.net> <1480503859.6873.280.camel@intel.com> <1480516308.13682.1.camel@andred.net> <1480517999.6873.298.camel@intel.com> <30a3dd41-2e1c-8658-b83d-8632944d1709@denx.de> <1481017522.17535.38.camel@intel.com> <8e1fdcb8-d9fb-0e51-2e21-91e7e7c6f450@linux.intel.com> <16ca1a50-f46a-196f-66b8-91f0d14f59c2@denx.de> Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: "Lopez, Mariano" , yocto@yoctoproject.org, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9?= Draszik Subject: Re: update mechanisms X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 15:14:12 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello everyone! Thanks for contributing directly to the page. It's great to see this done collaboratively. On Tue, 2016-12-06 at 23:38 +0100, Stefano Babic wrote: > Hi Philip, > > On 06/12/2016 19:45, Philip Balister wrote: > > On 12/06/2016 06:11 AM, Lopez, Mariano wrote: > >> I agree with you, that we need to have a section per project, the table > >> is too limiting. > > > > I just skimmed the page and the table format isn't working well with the > > length of the blocks of text. > > > > Agree - I think it is better to have a section per project. That always has been the goal, and I now updated the page accordingly. I tried to summarize the key aspects of each mechanism in the table itself. That's something that I haven't seen elsewhere and something that the page can I tried to be as fair and objective as possible, please shout if I messed something up or you don't agree with my summary. In particular the "complexity" column is a bit subjective. Stefano, I hope you don't mind that I did not quite buy the "easy to use" characterization of swupdate ;-) For a system that is as flexible as swupdate, I'd expect a more difficult learning curve and some need to customize the system before using it, so I added a "(but requires customization!?)" comment to that statement. Kristian, I added a comment that Mender requires U-Boot. That is correct, isn't it? I understand that this restriction allows you to implement things like automatic rollback, but it's worth mentioning that this comes with that limitation. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.