From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id C4688E00C39; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 07:13:34 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [209.85.210.194 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.5 RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM RBL: SORBS: sender is a spam source * [209.85.210.194 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] Received: from mail-wj0-f194.google.com (mail-wj0-f194.google.com [209.85.210.194]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FEB7E00C31 for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 07:13:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wj0-f194.google.com with SMTP id kp2so12037031wjc.0 for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 07:13:33 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2Lg7f+uzEz446G6NAkeRS6y8n+ji548VZ3t6tK7TKF8=; b=JC+hWcWuHlkIi0buav7qrNXvYlzPTTY8l4ozfM+deT4VBYfkv5RaL2WvNIcxtq4Pn8 OvyvjYdMuTL7o3dgJuPPZ7QBFocYqF+DydcfIANQlnVl4ge6dLBHdx+N2K6z5VwdJPes C2VpGIFt7+nOpwdypGU/2eLkdyfJOnZ2v/c/OaBvKINL1byDqXmFCekKmELo7S3IfxNh etkgz0Ko05OGJXoEQwUTr7rQ6AN8Y7Z3aNG6zOf1kgO1JAJPRg3ty8q6kjI7T7VlJXZu StYQfeQ2S7MEjl2scRYvrLVi5kMjz9hrbgnpR0RE2M58CqVaasToh0HBbY8KlMD30FFJ E2Lg== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC00vsERIRPuajylqRnAhKp6aKzekrNGJuzGwRil6x/jk9yrQYXK+y/jiseef+vWn6g== X-Received: by 10.195.8.132 with SMTP id dk4mr77103231wjd.33.1481555612285; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 07:13:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from tfsielt31850 ([77.107.218.170]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g17sm57708277wjs.38.2016.12.12.07.13.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 12 Dec 2016 07:13:31 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1481555608.2518.10.camel@andred.net> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9?= Draszik To: Patrick Ohly , Stefano Babic Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 15:13:28 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1481017522.17535.38.camel@intel.com> References: <20161121120355.18309-1-git@andred.net> <1480503859.6873.280.camel@intel.com> <1480516308.13682.1.camel@andred.net> <1480517999.6873.298.camel@intel.com> <30a3dd41-2e1c-8658-b83d-8632944d1709@denx.de> <1481017522.17535.38.camel@intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.2-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org, "Lopez, Mariano" Subject: Re: update mechanisms X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 15:13:34 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi, On Tue, 2016-12-06 at 10:45 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: > On Tue, 2016-12-06 at 10:01 +0100, Stefano Babic wrote: > > Hi Patrick, > > > > On 30/11/2016 15:59, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > > I've started a Wiki page > > > https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/System_Update - rudimentary at the > > > moment, but might as well be mentioned already now. > > > > I have seen Mariano added an entry for SWUpdate, too, thanks  - I would > > like to edit for better explanation on some parts. Should I try to edit > > directly the page or is it better to discuss it here ? > > Use your own judgment. If its uncontroversial, the feel free to edit the > page directly, otherwise let's discuss it here. > > If feel that putting information directly into the table is too limiting > (it should be brief), then feel free to start a complete section about > SWUpdate.  > > I'll do the same for swupd. Editing the sections should be possible > without conflicts, we just have to be more careful about editing the > table concurrently. It looks as if some highlights about swupdate can equally be said about swupd: - dual copy is supported - my minimal swupd-based rescue initramfs is around 4MB Cheers, Andre'