From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pg0-x244.google.com (mail-pg0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3td5Kb4vMTzDvk9 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 14:48:51 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="JrZgeE2F"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by mail-pg0-x244.google.com with SMTP id p66so3023065pga.2 for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 19:48:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RaX8XNHM7lFxOqQjdf7KaQ9V21PSyocKNYC0NG8vkfU=; b=JrZgeE2FCPSejSkONDk3VuSG+jvWzKD7T8TxysKGrTc2BCUSQHc0CUGF6RZrS6qveb b9HaQSIl4/DCVOXo+ZyQl6OzYatNDsZTSpSibSMUO+w4s3l/XMSMLfWyG9/yKTMo/dFZ yAIXozjBtzOAm6xLbtQQNOCz6CmrfbfGPGJuP2dRCwF9vkeew9U5JVlcVLDJJDevEZ6O WLak9es//crvcLCZfZMv5uwP3/N3HFIguDb5yq1BIA5Ot4pE7IwNHDPPSORtMrvVwCoG 7MsODGjzN+zyNrFxxFhL8OsArwY0jswdhNdTmqW84h6PlNvlQA4T6IMp0BPoRk7faxLf r3Rw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RaX8XNHM7lFxOqQjdf7KaQ9V21PSyocKNYC0NG8vkfU=; b=SujujtBvD0ZXH85q9bQ6FQL/7PzjkF4NvjUAthnylGStq1umT3SpFIXEGW4oOFGC2N kSKWJBAO/Ihq472t25grrXXEiR3apK+UEDVfzq1YjBtyxA7Ulj3voQCD7JJYYaoAzJVr EZTUizBl6ILlaSEe/bW4ZpHc/12Wg5doTH4hK3u9pjqnk9hX6bhBvNAQQTGIPAb7J9JN i0FlOYunmNN15WNhO9dAUhK0i40riPcnvQ9j3Z5GwAfGOfWl0znvNS0KYXhEbAjeVJt+ /nSQ0tfyZTJi51f1mxV8Q/aK4ISAGPkFjwXOsi3TBrbgVnFikNJLR1LBfezYl3OO5kcs TxXA== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC01r87/vDteTbxfMCmTyIvAf3Us26IKoBQPbTXQ2qVfLWPqN2JP9LAzqCWYjOmn2zQ== X-Received: by 10.84.217.216 with SMTP id d24mr192622769plj.101.1481600929825; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 19:48:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from cyril.ozlabs.ibm.com ([122.99.82.10]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id e5sm8384521pfd.77.2016.12.12.19.48.47 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 12 Dec 2016 19:48:49 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1481600925.10426.5.camel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH linux 1/3] ARM: dts: aspeed: Update palmetto device tree From: Cyril Bur To: Joel Stanley Cc: OpenBMC Maillist Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 14:48:45 +1100 In-Reply-To: References: <20161209054323.7320-1-cyrilbur@gmail.com> <20161209054323.7320-2-cyrilbur@gmail.com> <1481598705.10426.3.camel@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 03:48:52 -0000 On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 14:29 +1100, Joel Stanley wrote: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Cyril Bur > wrote: > > > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-bmc-opp-palmetto.dts > > > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-bmc-opp-palmetto.dts > > > > @@ -17,7 +17,30 @@ > > > >         }; > > > > > > > >         memory { > > > > -               reg = <0x40000000 0x10000000>; > > > > +               reg = <0x40000000 0x20000000>; > > > > +       }; > > > > > > Can you send this in a separate patch? It should go into the tree > > > now. > > > > > > > Yep, should I send just for palmetto? > > > > Do you have a list of other platforms? I figure all the ast2400 > > based > > aspeed-bmc-opp-* should get this change, should I include them all > > in > > one patch or all individually? > > One patch will do. I checked all of the machines and they all have > 512MB (minus bits that I assume are reserved for framebuffers, etc.): > > Barreleye: 499020 kB > Palmetto: 424204 kB > Firestone: 416020 kB > Garrison: 416012 kB > > Ok great thanks! Final question, I assume the same thing in a separate patch is good for the framebuffer, I'd forgotten that the size of VGA memory can be altered by a hardware strapping reg '0x1E6E2070 Hardware Strapping Table' bits 3:2 define it. The default is for 16MB, is it safe assume the platforms will come up with strapping reg in default state? > Cheers, > > Joel