From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-f54.google.com (mail-it0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 988137720B for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 15:37:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f54.google.com with SMTP id j191so3111366ita.1 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 07:37:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:organization:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=CXPGMV+yKq4s3ERZLiSkmWgCWrIsdGFBOcysI3avw3Q=; b=shcmTFfcjFV6yri+9z2hMMuaXSf791MkjOeVErFanwbr+iKF2qnEr2Dc4fkAyakjSb 2UhSWREIBnss3BXNS8aI0GVPZyVwYssHLGFf3ErusnbKIt67t2bA6zjwcd7XIOx6PWB6 PZxh6JG/ZU/EEqUfU76R2qJl6vtdrFPfKl9IVSBzGBAyVNmexW7v/N1lSJSvry1i8o62 q2/CgjVBb9tARiQhMOlwjiEZnVMilEAX9vyhcRae96jB0fLYsRajbjBY5xgLPzMezhO8 4aw4ImRZ7Ih0h+rToSAO0VlXTCZgh/dk3HrYxLOdKAnN9QaQHUAL/vuuUZza8HA5q43L hSJg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:date:organization :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CXPGMV+yKq4s3ERZLiSkmWgCWrIsdGFBOcysI3avw3Q=; b=LGE1ysPTAgXzbn/TKtl0gLi9GzmH8skiQm/rrNiKkcYrqwEI2jQMZ6GcVEN4zGy4aR l4w4/T3P1R34d7m7dHuAvhWT/xZHHNP+gxpDp7k/a7BW+nWm942zDI0jyz4wS3tW4NyB XaDtrxsJU/vYHS0UWFCEwavKP5JNHvZl9Nb5DBXUbxzy0QdQqTT5r9XbzzLdR+jbpl9j R5IPhX1ONpYGwkN/SfewRXIQXct99aPUC3dGfuzxyiqlo0/0k1TqjBKLmSnRMNjxP5m0 NbMCaGkjR5lEWwFoFjSc4SKpBRgDAAAJTNohaloVHHd+Ygs1a0FBPH+z5LeHQNhIxqrs lDfw== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC01/PjUUz/6BnYqANaSpt2aBKitD5oCQj40ryqV3NyemPnr3lVR9+QLryawpOhAafluR X-Received: by 10.36.238.139 with SMTP id b133mr7775777iti.81.1481729866124; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 07:37:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from pohly-mobl1 (p57A561C0.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [87.165.97.192]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p71sm23100396ioe.33.2016.12.14.07.37.44 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 14 Dec 2016 07:37:45 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1481729863.1544.33.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: OpenEmbedded Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 16:37:43 +0100 Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: multiconfig + siteinfo.bbclass X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 15:37:45 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello! While trying out a multiconfig with two configurations (one for MACHINE = intel-corei7-64, one for quark) in custom Ostro derivative I got an error while parsing recipes: ERROR: /work/iot-ref-kit/openembedded-core/../meta-openembedded/meta-python/recipes-devtools/python/python-m2crypto_0.23.0.bb: Unable to determine endianness for architecture 'INVALID' That error comes from OE-core's meta/classes/siteinfo.bbclass; python () { sitedata = set(siteinfo_data(d)) if "endian-little" in sitedata: d.setVar("SITEINFO_ENDIANNESS", "le") elif "endian-big" in sitedata: d.setVar("SITEINFO_ENDIANNESS", "be") else: bb.error("Unable to determine endianness for architecture '%s'" % d.getVar("HOST_ARCH", True)) bb.fatal("Please add your architecture to siteinfo.bbclass") HOST_ARCH is set to "x86_64" when not using BBMULTICONFIG in local.conf. It's not specific to that recipe, everything using siteinfo.bbclass seems to be affected. OE-core is d62f18c3 and bitbake is b65a81933 - both fairly recent, but not quite master. I don't see any relevant changes since then. However, I can't reproduce this with just Poky :-/ Any suggestions? -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.