Re: [PATCH] net/af_packet: initialize link interrupt callback queue

[Chas Williams <3chas3@gmail.com>]

On Tue, 2016-12-20 at 14:20 +0000, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 12/17/2016 6:03 PM, Chas Williams wrote:
> > This patch initializes the eth_dev->link_intr_cbs queue which is
> > used when af_packet is passed into rte_eth_ev_callback_register().
> 
> Why do you want to register callback to af_packet PMD, it won't be
> calling them?

Because I have a some other code that basically treats all the PMD's
the same way.  Do I really need to write an exception for that code
that says "if this is driver such and such don't call this API routine?"

> > 
> > Fixes: 4dc294158cac ("ethdev: support optional Rx and Tx callbacks")
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Chas Williams <3chas3@gmail.com>
> 
> Please cc the maintainers...

OK

> 
> CC: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
> 
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/af_packet/rte_eth_af_packet.c | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/af_packet/rte_eth_af_packet.c b/drivers/net/af_packet/rte_eth_af_packet.c
> > index a1e13ff..ea5070a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/af_packet/rte_eth_af_packet.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/af_packet/rte_eth_af_packet.c
> > @@ -708,6 +708,7 @@ rte_pmd_init_internals(const char *name,
> >  	(*eth_dev)->data->drv_name = pmd_af_packet_drv.driver.name;
> >  	(*eth_dev)->data->kdrv = RTE_KDRV_NONE;
> >  	(*eth_dev)->data->numa_node = numa_node;
> > +	TAILQ_INIT(&((*eth_dev)->link_intr_cbs));
> >  
> >  	return 0;
> >  
> > 
> 
>