From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Duyck, Alexander H Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 17:10:02 +0000 Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [next PATCH 9/9] igb: Revert "igb: Revert support for build_skb in igb" In-Reply-To: <1483720797.25700.60.camel@intel.com> References: <20170106160850.2030.39073.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20170106161131.2030.4342.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <1483720797.25700.60.camel@intel.com> Message-ID: <1483722600.13286.18.camel@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org List-ID: On Fri, 2017-01-06 at 08:39 -0800, Jeff Kirsher wrote: > On Fri, 2017-01-06 at 08:11 -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote: > > > > From: Alexander Duyck > > > > This reverts commit f9d40f6a9921 ("igb: Revert support for build_skb in > > igb") and adds a few changes to update it to work with the latest version > > of igb. We are now able to revert the removal of this due to the fact > > that with the recent changes to the page count and the use of > > DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC we can make the pages writable so we should not be > > invalidating the additional data added when we call build_skb. > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck > > --- > > ?drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c |?? 47 > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > ?1 file changed, 47 insertions(+) > > Weird, this patch is not showing up in patchworks. I will get this patch > added as well to my tree and work on getting it to show up in patchworks. > Maybe it is the quotes in the patch description? ?If so feel free to replace them with some other form of punctuation if needed. - Alex