From: Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com>
To: Phil Blundell <pb@pbcl.net>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] rootfs-postcommands.bbclass: sort passwd entries
Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2017 09:06:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1483776414.4383.22.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1483737447.4360.180.camel@pbcl.net>
On Fri, 2017-01-06 at 21:17 +0000, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-01-05 at 16:38 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > The /etc passwd files in a rootfs consist of the default entries from
> > base-passwd plus anything that gets added by preinst scripts or
> > extrausers.bbclass.
> >
> > The execution order of preinst scripts is not perfectly
> > deterministic,
> > or at least unrelated changes caused it to change in a
> > non-deterministic way, resulting in irrelevant changes in the order
> > of
> > passwd entries.
> >
> > Such re-ordering is bad for reproducible builds and file-based update
> > mechanisms like swupd which work best if changes are as minimal as
> > possible.
> >
> > To achieve that, the files get sorted in a post-processing command,
> > enabled by default.
>
> Won't the numeric UIDs still be non-deterministic, though? If the goal
> is reproducible builds then it doesn't sound as though this quite fixes
> the problem.
Yes, but there's already a solution for that problem:
useradd-staticids.bbclass
I was assuming that someone who wants identical files is already using
that. Should it be mentioned in a comment next to the new feature?
--
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-07 8:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-05 15:38 [PATCH 1/1] rootfs-postcommands.bbclass: sort passwd entries Patrick Ohly
2017-01-06 21:17 ` Phil Blundell
2017-01-07 8:06 ` Patrick Ohly [this message]
2017-01-07 9:59 ` Phil Blundell
2017-01-07 19:00 ` Patrick Ohly
2017-01-07 22:52 ` Richard Purdie
2017-01-08 9:36 ` Phil Blundell
2017-01-08 14:04 ` Patrick Ohly
2017-01-09 10:09 ` [PATCH V2 " Patrick Ohly
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1483776414.4383.22.camel@intel.com \
--to=patrick.ohly@intel.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=pb@pbcl.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.