All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: xfs:  commit 6552321831dc "xfs: remove i_iolock and use    i_rwsem in the VFS inode instead"  change causes hang
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2017 10:31:22 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1483889482.8189.104.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170108151430.GA29847@lst.de>

On Sun, 2017-01-08 at 16:14 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 10:03:09AM -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > But not normally for a normal file read.
> 
> Depends on the file system.  In addition to XFS at least the NFS
> also uses i_rwsem by default.  Also all file systems supporting
> a DAX I/O path.

We're only interested in the integrity of the local file system.

> > Unless something has changed recently, to synchronize reading files to
> > calculate the file hash and writing xattrs it has to take the i_rwsem
> > prior to reading the file.
> 
> No, you must simply not do this at all.  If you take a lock that
> belongs to the fs and is not your own over ->read_iter you're toast
> as you've seen.

Christoph,  this isn't a new story and telling me this isn't very
productive.  Originally there was an IMA specific lock.  The i_mutex was
taken just to access the xattr.   Unforutnately, having two locks caused
a lockdep between the normal read/validate and setxattr.  As a result,
we dropped the IMA specific lock.

IMA needs a mechanism for quickly reading a file to calculate the file
hash and validate (or set) the file signature/hash stored as an xattr,
prior to any other process getting access to the file.

Mimi


  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-08 15:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-08 14:48 xfs: commit 6552321831dc "xfs: remove i_iolock and use i_rwsem in the VFS inode instead" change causes hang Mimi Zohar
2017-01-08 14:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-08 15:03   ` Mimi Zohar
2017-01-08 15:14     ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-08 15:31       ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2017-01-08 15:37         ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-08 16:38           ` Mimi Zohar
2017-01-08 16:43             ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-08 17:59   ` James Bottomley
2017-01-08 18:18     ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-08 18:57       ` James Bottomley
2017-01-08 19:09         ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-08 19:26           ` Al Viro
2017-01-08 20:10             ` Mimi Zohar
2017-01-08 19:39           ` Mimi Zohar
2017-01-09 19:44           ` Jeff Layton
2017-01-10  2:54             ` Mimi Zohar
2017-01-10 16:22               ` Jeff Layton
2017-01-08 19:16         ` Mimi Zohar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1483889482.8189.104.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.