All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: jaegeuk@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "f2fs: remove percpu_count due to performance regression" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2017 16:26:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <148397559395124@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    f2fs: remove percpu_count due to performance regression

to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     f2fs-remove-percpu_count-due-to-performance-regression.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From 35782b233f37e48ecc469d9c7232f3f6a7fad41a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 19:09:57 -0700
Subject: f2fs: remove percpu_count due to performance regression

From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>

commit 35782b233f37e48ecc469d9c7232f3f6a7fad41a upstream.

This patch removes percpu_count usage due to performance regression in iozone.

Fixes: 523be8a6b3 ("f2fs: use percpu_counter for page counters")
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/f2fs/debug.c |   12 ++++++------
 fs/f2fs/f2fs.h  |   12 ++++++------
 fs/f2fs/super.c |   16 +++++-----------
 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/f2fs/debug.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/debug.c
@@ -310,17 +310,17 @@ static int stat_show(struct seq_file *s,
 		seq_printf(s, "  - Inner Struct Count: tree: %d(%d), node: %d\n",
 				si->ext_tree, si->zombie_tree, si->ext_node);
 		seq_puts(s, "\nBalancing F2FS Async:\n");
-		seq_printf(s, "  - inmem: %4lld, wb_bios: %4d\n",
+		seq_printf(s, "  - inmem: %4d, wb_bios: %4d\n",
 			   si->inmem_pages, si->wb_bios);
-		seq_printf(s, "  - nodes: %4lld in %4d\n",
+		seq_printf(s, "  - nodes: %4d in %4d\n",
 			   si->ndirty_node, si->node_pages);
-		seq_printf(s, "  - dents: %4lld in dirs:%4d (%4d)\n",
+		seq_printf(s, "  - dents: %4d in dirs:%4d (%4d)\n",
 			   si->ndirty_dent, si->ndirty_dirs, si->ndirty_all);
-		seq_printf(s, "  - datas: %4lld in files:%4d\n",
+		seq_printf(s, "  - datas: %4d in files:%4d\n",
 			   si->ndirty_data, si->ndirty_files);
-		seq_printf(s, "  - meta: %4lld in %4d\n",
+		seq_printf(s, "  - meta: %4d in %4d\n",
 			   si->ndirty_meta, si->meta_pages);
-		seq_printf(s, "  - imeta: %4lld\n",
+		seq_printf(s, "  - imeta: %4d\n",
 			   si->ndirty_imeta);
 		seq_printf(s, "  - NATs: %9d/%9d\n  - SITs: %9d/%9d\n",
 			   si->dirty_nats, si->nats, si->dirty_sits, si->sits);
--- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
+++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
@@ -819,7 +819,7 @@ struct f2fs_sb_info {
 	atomic_t nr_wb_bios;			/* # of writeback bios */
 
 	/* # of pages, see count_type */
-	struct percpu_counter nr_pages[NR_COUNT_TYPE];
+	atomic_t nr_pages[NR_COUNT_TYPE];
 	/* # of allocated blocks */
 	struct percpu_counter alloc_valid_block_count;
 
@@ -1233,7 +1233,7 @@ static inline void dec_valid_block_count
 
 static inline void inc_page_count(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int count_type)
 {
-	percpu_counter_inc(&sbi->nr_pages[count_type]);
+	atomic_inc(&sbi->nr_pages[count_type]);
 
 	if (count_type == F2FS_DIRTY_DATA || count_type == F2FS_INMEM_PAGES)
 		return;
@@ -1250,7 +1250,7 @@ static inline void inode_inc_dirty_pages
 
 static inline void dec_page_count(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int count_type)
 {
-	percpu_counter_dec(&sbi->nr_pages[count_type]);
+	atomic_dec(&sbi->nr_pages[count_type]);
 }
 
 static inline void inode_dec_dirty_pages(struct inode *inode)
@@ -1266,7 +1266,7 @@ static inline void inode_dec_dirty_pages
 
 static inline s64 get_pages(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int count_type)
 {
-	return percpu_counter_sum_positive(&sbi->nr_pages[count_type]);
+	return atomic_read(&sbi->nr_pages[count_type]);
 }
 
 static inline int get_dirty_pages(struct inode *inode)
@@ -2187,8 +2187,8 @@ struct f2fs_stat_info {
 	unsigned long long hit_largest, hit_cached, hit_rbtree;
 	unsigned long long hit_total, total_ext;
 	int ext_tree, zombie_tree, ext_node;
-	s64 ndirty_node, ndirty_dent, ndirty_meta, ndirty_data, ndirty_imeta;
-	s64 inmem_pages;
+	int ndirty_node, ndirty_dent, ndirty_meta, ndirty_data, ndirty_imeta;
+	int inmem_pages;
 	unsigned int ndirty_dirs, ndirty_files, ndirty_all;
 	int nats, dirty_nats, sits, dirty_sits, fnids;
 	int total_count, utilization;
--- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
@@ -688,10 +688,6 @@ static void f2fs_destroy_inode(struct in
 
 static void destroy_percpu_info(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
 {
-	int i;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < NR_COUNT_TYPE; i++)
-		percpu_counter_destroy(&sbi->nr_pages[i]);
 	percpu_counter_destroy(&sbi->alloc_valid_block_count);
 	percpu_counter_destroy(&sbi->total_valid_inode_count);
 }
@@ -1442,6 +1438,7 @@ int sanity_check_ckpt(struct f2fs_sb_inf
 static void init_sb_info(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
 {
 	struct f2fs_super_block *raw_super = sbi->raw_super;
+	int i;
 
 	sbi->log_sectors_per_block =
 		le32_to_cpu(raw_super->log_sectors_per_block);
@@ -1466,6 +1463,9 @@ static void init_sb_info(struct f2fs_sb_
 	sbi->interval_time[REQ_TIME] = DEF_IDLE_INTERVAL;
 	clear_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK);
 
+	for (i = 0; i < NR_COUNT_TYPE; i++)
+		atomic_set(&sbi->nr_pages[i], 0);
+
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sbi->s_list);
 	mutex_init(&sbi->umount_mutex);
 	mutex_init(&sbi->wio_mutex[NODE]);
@@ -1481,13 +1481,7 @@ static void init_sb_info(struct f2fs_sb_
 
 static int init_percpu_info(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
 {
-	int i, err;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < NR_COUNT_TYPE; i++) {
-		err = percpu_counter_init(&sbi->nr_pages[i], 0, GFP_KERNEL);
-		if (err)
-			return err;
-	}
+	int err;
 
 	err = percpu_counter_init(&sbi->alloc_valid_block_count, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (err)


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from jaegeuk@kernel.org are

queue-4.9/f2fs-remove-percpu_count-due-to-performance-regression.patch
queue-4.9/f2fs-hide-a-maybe-uninitialized-warning.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2017-01-09 15:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=148397559395124@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.