All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: tony@atomide.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "PM / wakeirq: Fix dedicated wakeirq for drivers not using autosuspend" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2017 16:27:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <148397566090107@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    PM / wakeirq: Fix dedicated wakeirq for drivers not using autosuspend

to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     pm-wakeirq-fix-dedicated-wakeirq-for-drivers-not-using-autosuspend.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From bed570307ed78f21b77cb04a1df781dee4a8f05a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 16:38:16 -0800
Subject: PM / wakeirq: Fix dedicated wakeirq for drivers not using autosuspend

From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>

commit bed570307ed78f21b77cb04a1df781dee4a8f05a upstream.

I noticed some wakeirq flakeyness with consumer drivers not using
autosuspend. For drivers not using autosuspend, the wakeirq may never
get unmasked in rpm_suspend() because of irq desc->depth.

We are configuring dedicated wakeirqs to start with IRQ_NOAUTOEN as we
naturally don't want them running until rpm_suspend() is called.

However, when a consumer driver initially calls pm_runtime_get(), we
now wrongly start with disable_irq_nosync() call on the dedicated
wakeirq that is disabled to start with.

This causes desc->depth to toggle between 1 and 2 instead of the usual
0 and 1. This can prevent enable_irq() from unmasking the wakeirq as
that only happens at desc->depth 1.

This does not necessarily show up with drivers using autosuspend as
there is time for disable_irq_nosync() before rpm_suspend() gets called
after the autosuspend timeout.

Let's fix the issue by adding wirq->status that lazily gets set on
the first rpm_suspend(). We also need PM runtime core private functions
for dev_pm_enable_wake_irq_check() and dev_pm_disable_wake_irq_check()
so we can enable the dedicated wakeirq on the first rpm_suspend().

While at it, let's also fix the comments for dev_pm_enable_wake_irq()
and dev_pm_disable_wake_irq(). Those can still be used by the consumer
drivers as needed because the IRQ core manages the interrupt usecount
for us.

Fixes: 4990d4fe327b (PM / Wakeirq: Add automated device wake IRQ handling)
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/base/power/power.h   |   19 ++++++++++
 drivers/base/power/runtime.c |    8 ++--
 drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c |   76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 3 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/base/power/power.h
+++ b/drivers/base/power/power.h
@@ -21,14 +21,22 @@ extern void pm_runtime_init(struct devic
 extern void pm_runtime_reinit(struct device *dev);
 extern void pm_runtime_remove(struct device *dev);
 
+#define WAKE_IRQ_DEDICATED_ALLOCATED	BIT(0)
+#define WAKE_IRQ_DEDICATED_MANAGED	BIT(1)
+#define WAKE_IRQ_DEDICATED_MASK		(WAKE_IRQ_DEDICATED_ALLOCATED | \
+					 WAKE_IRQ_DEDICATED_MANAGED)
+
 struct wake_irq {
 	struct device *dev;
+	unsigned int status;
 	int irq;
-	bool dedicated_irq:1;
 };
 
 extern void dev_pm_arm_wake_irq(struct wake_irq *wirq);
 extern void dev_pm_disarm_wake_irq(struct wake_irq *wirq);
+extern void dev_pm_enable_wake_irq_check(struct device *dev,
+					 bool can_change_status);
+extern void dev_pm_disable_wake_irq_check(struct device *dev);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
 
@@ -104,6 +112,15 @@ static inline void dev_pm_disarm_wake_ir
 {
 }
 
+static inline void dev_pm_enable_wake_irq_check(struct device *dev,
+						bool can_change_status)
+{
+}
+
+static inline void dev_pm_disable_wake_irq_check(struct device *dev)
+{
+}
+
 #endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
--- a/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
@@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ static int rpm_suspend(struct device *de
 
 	callback = RPM_GET_CALLBACK(dev, runtime_suspend);
 
-	dev_pm_enable_wake_irq(dev);
+	dev_pm_enable_wake_irq_check(dev, true);
 	retval = rpm_callback(callback, dev);
 	if (retval)
 		goto fail;
@@ -554,7 +554,7 @@ static int rpm_suspend(struct device *de
 	return retval;
 
  fail:
-	dev_pm_disable_wake_irq(dev);
+	dev_pm_disable_wake_irq_check(dev);
 	__update_runtime_status(dev, RPM_ACTIVE);
 	dev->power.deferred_resume = false;
 	wake_up_all(&dev->power.wait_queue);
@@ -737,12 +737,12 @@ static int rpm_resume(struct device *dev
 
 	callback = RPM_GET_CALLBACK(dev, runtime_resume);
 
-	dev_pm_disable_wake_irq(dev);
+	dev_pm_disable_wake_irq_check(dev);
 	retval = rpm_callback(callback, dev);
 	if (retval) {
 		__update_runtime_status(dev, RPM_SUSPENDED);
 		pm_runtime_cancel_pending(dev);
-		dev_pm_enable_wake_irq(dev);
+		dev_pm_enable_wake_irq_check(dev, false);
 	} else {
  no_callback:
 		__update_runtime_status(dev, RPM_ACTIVE);
--- a/drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c
@@ -110,8 +110,10 @@ void dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(struct device
 	dev->power.wakeirq = NULL;
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->power.lock, flags);
 
-	if (wirq->dedicated_irq)
+	if (wirq->status & WAKE_IRQ_DEDICATED_ALLOCATED) {
 		free_irq(wirq->irq, wirq);
+		wirq->status &= ~WAKE_IRQ_DEDICATED_MASK;
+	}
 	kfree(wirq);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_clear_wake_irq);
@@ -179,7 +181,6 @@ int dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq(struct
 
 	wirq->dev = dev;
 	wirq->irq = irq;
-	wirq->dedicated_irq = true;
 	irq_set_status_flags(irq, IRQ_NOAUTOEN);
 
 	/*
@@ -195,6 +196,8 @@ int dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq(struct
 	if (err)
 		goto err_free_irq;
 
+	wirq->status = WAKE_IRQ_DEDICATED_ALLOCATED;
+
 	return err;
 
 err_free_irq:
@@ -210,9 +213,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_set_dedicated_w
  * dev_pm_enable_wake_irq - Enable device wake-up interrupt
  * @dev: Device
  *
- * Called from the bus code or the device driver for
- * runtime_suspend() to enable the wake-up interrupt while
- * the device is running.
+ * Optionally called from the bus code or the device driver for
+ * runtime_resume() to override the PM runtime core managed wake-up
+ * interrupt handling to enable the wake-up interrupt.
  *
  * Note that for runtime_suspend()) the wake-up interrupts
  * should be unconditionally enabled unlike for suspend()
@@ -222,7 +225,7 @@ void dev_pm_enable_wake_irq(struct devic
 {
 	struct wake_irq *wirq = dev->power.wakeirq;
 
-	if (wirq && wirq->dedicated_irq)
+	if (wirq && (wirq->status & WAKE_IRQ_DEDICATED_ALLOCATED))
 		enable_irq(wirq->irq);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_enable_wake_irq);
@@ -231,20 +234,73 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_enable_wake_irq
  * dev_pm_disable_wake_irq - Disable device wake-up interrupt
  * @dev: Device
  *
- * Called from the bus code or the device driver for
- * runtime_resume() to disable the wake-up interrupt while
- * the device is running.
+ * Optionally called from the bus code or the device driver for
+ * runtime_suspend() to override the PM runtime core managed wake-up
+ * interrupt handling to disable the wake-up interrupt.
  */
 void dev_pm_disable_wake_irq(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct wake_irq *wirq = dev->power.wakeirq;
 
-	if (wirq && wirq->dedicated_irq)
+	if (wirq && (wirq->status & WAKE_IRQ_DEDICATED_ALLOCATED))
 		disable_irq_nosync(wirq->irq);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_disable_wake_irq);
 
 /**
+ * dev_pm_enable_wake_irq_check - Checks and enables wake-up interrupt
+ * @dev: Device
+ * @can_change_status: Can change wake-up interrupt status
+ *
+ * Enables wakeirq conditionally. We need to enable wake-up interrupt
+ * lazily on the first rpm_suspend(). This is needed as the consumer device
+ * starts in RPM_SUSPENDED state, and the the first pm_runtime_get() would
+ * otherwise try to disable already disabled wakeirq. The wake-up interrupt
+ * starts disabled with IRQ_NOAUTOEN set.
+ *
+ * Should be only called from rpm_suspend() and rpm_resume() path.
+ * Caller must hold &dev->power.lock to change wirq->status
+ */
+void dev_pm_enable_wake_irq_check(struct device *dev,
+				  bool can_change_status)
+{
+	struct wake_irq *wirq = dev->power.wakeirq;
+
+	if (!wirq || !((wirq->status & WAKE_IRQ_DEDICATED_MASK)))
+		return;
+
+	if (likely(wirq->status & WAKE_IRQ_DEDICATED_MANAGED)) {
+		goto enable;
+	} else if (can_change_status) {
+		wirq->status |= WAKE_IRQ_DEDICATED_MANAGED;
+		goto enable;
+	}
+
+	return;
+
+enable:
+	enable_irq(wirq->irq);
+}
+
+/**
+ * dev_pm_disable_wake_irq_check - Checks and disables wake-up interrupt
+ * @dev: Device
+ *
+ * Disables wake-up interrupt conditionally based on status.
+ * Should be only called from rpm_suspend() and rpm_resume() path.
+ */
+void dev_pm_disable_wake_irq_check(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct wake_irq *wirq = dev->power.wakeirq;
+
+	if (!wirq || !((wirq->status & WAKE_IRQ_DEDICATED_MASK)))
+		return;
+
+	if (wirq->status & WAKE_IRQ_DEDICATED_MANAGED)
+		disable_irq_nosync(wirq->irq);
+}
+
+/**
  * dev_pm_arm_wake_irq - Arm device wake-up
  * @wirq: Device wake-up interrupt
  *


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from tony@atomide.com are

queue-4.9/pm-wakeirq-fix-dedicated-wakeirq-for-drivers-not-using-autosuspend.patch
queue-4.9/usb-musb-fix-trying-to-free-already-free-irq-4.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2017-01-09 15:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=148397566090107@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.