From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
cja@gmx.net, darcari@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sdhci-acpi: support deferred probe
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 08:58:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1484096336.2253.4.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFo5jcv+YathFEG86fAPt=nH42Z35LjztDV0ozFNY8d48Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 2017-01-10 at 16:38 +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 26 December 2016 at 03:28, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > With commit
> > 67bf5156edc4 (gpio / ACPI: fix returned error from
> > acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get()),
> > mmc_gpiod_request_cd() returns -EPROBE_DEFER if GPIO is not ready
> > when sdhci-acpi driver is probed, and sdhci-acpi driver should be
> > probed
> > again later in this case.
> >
> > This fixes an order issue when both GPIO and sdhci-acpi drivers are
> > built as
> > modules.
> >
> > Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177101
> > Tested-by: Jonas Aaberg <cja@gmx.net>
> > Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
> Seems like both a fixes tag and a stable tag would we useful.
>
The order issue always exists.
And commit 67bf5156edc4 just makes it possible to fix it in this way.
I can cc stable 4.9 as it depends on 67bf5156edc4, but I don't think
this needs a fixes tag.
thanks,
rui
> Please re-spin and make also the changes that Adrian proposed to the
> change log.
>
> Kind regards
> Uffe
>
> >
> > ---
> > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c | 5 ++++-
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c
> > b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c
> > index 160f695..5440323 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c
> > @@ -466,7 +466,10 @@ static int sdhci_acpi_probe(struct
> > platform_device *pdev)
> > if (sdhci_acpi_flag(c, SDHCI_ACPI_SD_CD)) {
> > bool v = sdhci_acpi_flag(c,
> > SDHCI_ACPI_SD_CD_OVERRIDE_LEVEL);
> >
> > - if (mmc_gpiod_request_cd(host->mmc, NULL, 0, v, 0,
> > NULL)) {
> > + err = mmc_gpiod_request_cd(host->mmc, NULL, 0, v,
> > 0, NULL);
> > + if (err) {
> > + if (err == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > + goto err_free;
> > dev_warn(dev, "failed to setup card detect
> > gpio\n");
> > c->use_runtime_pm = false;
> > }
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-
> > mmc" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-11 0:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-26 2:28 [PATCH] sdhci-acpi: support deferred probe Zhang Rui
2017-01-05 10:06 ` Adrian Hunter
2017-01-10 15:38 ` Ulf Hansson
2017-01-11 0:58 ` Zhang Rui [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1484096336.2253.4.camel@intel.com \
--to=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=cja@gmx.net \
--cc=darcari@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.