Re: [PATCH net-next 5/6] bnxt_en: Pass RoCE app priority to firmware.

[Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1560 bytes --]

On Wed, 2017-01-11 at 09:17 -0800, Michael Chan wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 7:46 AM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> wrote:
> > 
> > From: Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>
> > Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 20:12:38 -0500
> > 
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_dcb.h
> > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_dcb.h
> > > index 35a0d28..f2630cc 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_dcb.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_dcb.h
> > > @@ -36,6 +36,9 @@ struct bnxt_cos2bw_cfg {
> > > 
> > >  #define HWRM_STRUCT_DATA_SUBTYPE_HOST_OPERATIONAL    0x0300
> > > 
> > > +#define ETH_P_ROCE           0x8915
> > 
> > There's also a similar define in the qedr infiniband driver, this
> > doesn't
> > make much sense.
> > 
> > Please add this to if_ether.h, and reference it from there in the
> > drivers.
> > 
> My colleague informed me that he has submitted a patch to do that
> through the rdma tree:
> 
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-rdma&m=148217575500983&w=2
> 
> But it hasn't been merged yet.  I can drop this patch now and wait
> for
> the RDMA patch to show up on net-next. Or I make the change later to
> use the common define when the RDMA patch is merged.  Thanks.

The patch for this is in my for-next area:

69ae543969ab RDMA: Adding ethertype ETH_P_IBOE

-- 
Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
    GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
   
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B  1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]