From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: prarit@redhat.com, acme@redhat.com,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, bp@suse.de,
eranian@google.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
harish.chegondi@intel.com, hpa@zytor.com, jolsa@redhat.com,
kan.liang@intel.com, mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
vincent.weaver@maine.edu
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix hardcoded socket 0 assumption in the Haswell init code" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 11:43:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <148464979721190@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix hardcoded socket 0 assumption in the Haswell init code
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
perf-x86-intel-uncore-fix-hardcoded-socket-0-assumption-in-the-haswell-init-code.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 6d6daa20945f3f598e56e18d1f926c08754f5801 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 10:09:25 -0500
Subject: perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix hardcoded socket 0 assumption in the Haswell init code
From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
commit 6d6daa20945f3f598e56e18d1f926c08754f5801 upstream.
hswep_uncore_cpu_init() uses a hardcoded physical package id 0 for the boot
cpu. This works as long as the boot CPU is actually on the physical package
0, which is normaly the case after power on / reboot.
But it fails with a NULL pointer dereference when a kdump kernel is started
on a secondary socket which has a different physical package id because the
locigal package translation for physical package 0 does not exist.
Use the logical package id of the boot cpu instead of hard coded 0.
[ tglx: Rewrote changelog once more ]
Fixes: cf6d445f6897 ("perf/x86/uncore: Track packages, not per CPU data")
Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Harish Chegondi <harish.chegondi@intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1483628965-2890-1-git-send-email-prarit@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
@@ -2686,7 +2686,7 @@ static struct intel_uncore_type *hswep_m
void hswep_uncore_cpu_init(void)
{
- int pkg = topology_phys_to_logical_pkg(0);
+ int pkg = boot_cpu_data.logical_proc_id;
if (hswep_uncore_cbox.num_boxes > boot_cpu_data.x86_max_cores)
hswep_uncore_cbox.num_boxes = boot_cpu_data.x86_max_cores;
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from prarit@redhat.com are
queue-4.9/perf-x86-intel-uncore-fix-hardcoded-socket-0-assumption-in-the-haswell-init-code.patch
next reply other threads:[~2017-01-17 10:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-17 10:43 gregkh [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-07-03 11:28 Patch "perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix hardcoded socket 0 assumption in the Haswell init code" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree gregkh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=148464979721190@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=harish.chegondi@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vincent.weaver@maine.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.