From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-f46.google.com (mail-it0-f46.google.com [209.85.214.46]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 122D265C5B for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 15:18:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f46.google.com with SMTP id r185so105668509ita.0 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 07:18:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to:references:organization :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AirE9PjIpNbhG1fCN5hZfMDK9hTyAjdTVa5agnljEHQ=; b=VW86F2oLN27HeL1mm+8Sb/nCsvL00F0sShsrc2X6odUBySZkvcTwwD+x5KiKTbPhvw cQXKOlWgmlxJjcAoEGDbuYM1Wm/ddBuZn32En8ocoecuEf3CXGHdj1uznoiPc03Xpe3X EcD91qJDnGkG0utUFn6zqD2p/tRUdn1LfZuHriapSTNWLD43VMu9Y+mTSEtMTPRiIXVN 44F8oV1E6qDgwq/4NwG8r1PluL1G16O4Ol2RvyU2hPKhPz18QIpVImypMcS+YbSa2qPV kcJc7s8FKKiuyra8BrkC4sP2RdjpSAdE7ufYVfRgpAB0xLAfMJ9beJ33zXjhZIGtJP7m b13g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AirE9PjIpNbhG1fCN5hZfMDK9hTyAjdTVa5agnljEHQ=; b=EUgKiiuElb0W0DmRmnzUcVJZE/3TeLlDl+iQQzQ4ruQFZ0e48c2X9d7pGqukWS6Nnn 7YRY0HeV2l36aCSUOztDsQZSoa3HyoGRveToAwBpr4E1b69etGWg742qDJbCWz2Cy8i9 P3tvFmTIH3J1Pyq7TJLA2T7k24ywiDzrWKdWee3FG4L05nDsh2qVqZkUfB6cB9T5iM8t AMYeSoCzBTn2496gQTHPnF7e0ygZIGLWtzbcjVJdYRkdouEFwxRCtjN0K2a5vkbBsl+e +XbGusPzx7Xw7McC3OFj6eAXCSjkJ1DPlsd4/SHCnw0+80pH9COT3fHB6URls/1zMj9U DIiQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLxieMJ8ekfW0mM+Jn+SDl/dkXvtww8A3QL7zfkWpwVjo0UwaGZLDyRgdQ5AvSOWlKE X-Received: by 10.36.249.6 with SMTP id l6mr19714802ith.32.1484666307765; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 07:18:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from pohly-mobl1 (p57A56390.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [87.165.99.144]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n30sm13089732ioe.32.2017.01.17.07.18.25 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 17 Jan 2017 07:18:26 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1484666304.19478.63.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org, Ross Burton Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 16:18:24 +0100 In-Reply-To: <8f61859759b1fe66f1e649ff341582bc51c93161.1484318890.git-series.patrick.ohly@intel.com> References: <8f61859759b1fe66f1e649ff341582bc51c93161.1484318890.git-series.patrick.ohly@intel.com> Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] runqueue.py: revised completion scheduler X-BeenThere: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussion that advance bitbake development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 15:18:28 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2017-01-13 at 15:51 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: > diff --git a/lib/bb/runqueue.py b/lib/bb/runqueue.py > index 48c6a79..0c4f286 100644 > --- a/lib/bb/runqueue.py > +++ b/lib/bb/runqueue.py > @@ -183,6 +183,18 @@ class RunQueueScheduler(object): [...] > + super(RunQueueSchedulerRmwork, self).__init__(runqueue, rqdata) The new line must be instead: super(RunQueueSchedulerCompletion, self).__init__(runqueue, rqdata) Obviously I haven't tested enough after renaming the scheduler :-/ -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.