From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id A7141E00828; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 01:19:13 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.223.174 listed in list.dnswl.org] * 0.5 RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM RBL: SORBS: sender is a spam source * [209.85.223.174 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-io0-f174.google.com (mail-io0-f174.google.com [209.85.223.174]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79C90E007EB for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 01:19:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-io0-f174.google.com with SMTP id j18so105764377ioe.2 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 01:19:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=E3IMf6U3t1gQBAYvKgkO9SIGbrxul1ne49/+3ynbMhc=; b=0pMr3wAvVYih90cG9Br5XExYtiJ8yj6IXQkzrulliZ8NvgMghqE8kzwVcnaVkkVpN/ Ccb3BOI6JCRxKOiQ1iVsnu6Ck0a1lczmBdJtVqF9Uquv+/vwc3xriykctHKLtkQof7KG gEGiCMQWH6BQuSIYjYlWuVgcTKZqvbOzpi2sN4Dx7XchE1soYZTdqOX2nqM+g4as6T+N pLCYeFW5XlZ5DUgfL3ua7Rqa+1bqiJAZFTWk6wmSUo6hgOkSaZUFzNMYQGvZX9GMhvNn dYO9ew0q/RtBkas7ZjqrkyySNyphBpFkOaoXlLj0v0sOyKjoqD36giYQgdFY6nacesft 3uPw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=E3IMf6U3t1gQBAYvKgkO9SIGbrxul1ne49/+3ynbMhc=; b=c+bi0v9mDX3b4+0QmCdRkKOsqrkiXU0OYEecrJCiGlqSkgbjA8P9rsf4OmDHHCnQZF JVHOD6kOXB1oIpmOUWc4597VJMrVjUy3BUGeP3/hXtPrUVDxICmDw6LPx91idqv7Sv6I 0VBTnVvMQnfibpZVtHxRixAP1/gEaH/mMYVRRCiKmdgZlgWdqPUHGfflXEu+3skpkvcJ qBO7H0Zr3zor99kvzZDA0cW+t+ZjEDQy6ndkaojbP7bNz+EgP1jab8ZnSMjBZXS2RYpr UTjnCp/pDK73pL6jo1DktxXawKU4hBte/bWAJcBDQIHn3FOCdKQNAYOvw+9LmQjJuKFL Up9A== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJeiriyhJJQtzp/gyfYuCn5Z6CUxeeTXE5mIjREYTuxGOFAgCI0LbiNmlli5b0EbFJN X-Received: by 10.107.154.17 with SMTP id c17mr22633170ioe.109.1485163147208; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 01:19:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from pohly-mobl1 (p5DE8FC12.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.232.252.18]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o1sm6130015itg.4.2017.01.23.01.19.04 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 23 Jan 2017 01:19:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1485163143.20333.17.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: colin.helliwell@ln-systems.com Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 10:19:03 +0100 In-Reply-To: <0aa701d2754c$f26ba1b0$d742e510$@ln-systems.com> References: <049201d2719c$fea9e670$fbfdb350$@ln-systems.com> <060101d27224$ad344a00$079cde00$@ln-systems.com> <53576169-6d7a-5db2-72c7-20e8d04ab5c5@windriver.com> <069b01d2723b$c14be860$43e3b920$@ln-systems.com> <19c3b372-c26a-85b5-9dea-f3b4524437df@windriver.com> <093001d27325$7dc14cd0$7943e670$@ln-systems.com> <0aa701d2754c$f26ba1b0$d742e510$@ln-systems.com> Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: 'Yocto discussion list' Subject: Re: Changing over to systemd (no dhcp) X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 09:19:13 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2017-01-23 at 07:47 +0000, colin.helliwell@ln-systems.com wrote: > Looking at one which does seem to switch over cleanly - dropbear - I'm > puzzled how the recipe [dropbear.inc, in poky/meta/recipes-core] > appears to install both init.d script and .service in its do_install, > yet only one or the other ultimately shows up in the rootfs..? > (Relates to my other question about how to determine the init type in > do_install) systemd.bbclass has a rm_sysvinit_initddir postfunc for do_install which removes sysvinit config files if the DISTRO_FEATURES enable systemd and do not enable sysvinit. rm_systemd_unitdir does the opposite when systemd is disabled and only sysvinit is enabled. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.