From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: agraf@suse.de, catalin.marinas@arm.com, geert+renesas@glider.be,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jszhang@marvell.com,
konrad.wilk@oracle.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "arm64: Fix swiotlb fallback allocation" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 17:02:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <148518736110870@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
arm64: Fix swiotlb fallback allocation
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
arm64-fix-swiotlb-fallback-allocation.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 524dabe1c68e0bca25ce7b108099e5d89472a101 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 12:46:33 +0100
Subject: arm64: Fix swiotlb fallback allocation
From: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
commit 524dabe1c68e0bca25ce7b108099e5d89472a101 upstream.
Commit b67a8b29df introduced logic to skip swiotlb allocation when all memory
is DMA accessible anyway.
While this is a great idea, __dma_alloc still calls swiotlb code unconditionally
to allocate memory when there is no CMA memory available. The swiotlb code is
called to ensure that we at least try get_free_pages().
Without initialization, swiotlb allocation code tries to access io_tlb_list
which is NULL. That results in a stack trace like this:
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000
[...]
[<ffff00000845b908>] swiotlb_tbl_map_single+0xd0/0x2b0
[<ffff00000845be94>] swiotlb_alloc_coherent+0x10c/0x198
[<ffff000008099dc0>] __dma_alloc+0x68/0x1a8
[<ffff000000a1b410>] drm_gem_cma_create+0x98/0x108 [drm]
[<ffff000000abcaac>] drm_fbdev_cma_create_with_funcs+0xbc/0x368 [drm_kms_helper]
[<ffff000000abcd84>] drm_fbdev_cma_create+0x2c/0x40 [drm_kms_helper]
[<ffff000000abc040>] drm_fb_helper_initial_config+0x238/0x410 [drm_kms_helper]
[<ffff000000abce88>] drm_fbdev_cma_init_with_funcs+0x98/0x160 [drm_kms_helper]
[<ffff000000abcf90>] drm_fbdev_cma_init+0x40/0x58 [drm_kms_helper]
[<ffff000000b47980>] vc4_kms_load+0x90/0xf0 [vc4]
[<ffff000000b46a94>] vc4_drm_bind+0xec/0x168 [vc4]
[...]
Thankfully swiotlb code just learned how to not do allocations with the FORCE_NO
option. This patch configures the swiotlb code to use that if we decide not to
initialize the swiotlb framework.
Fixes: b67a8b29df ("arm64: mm: only initialize swiotlb when necessary")
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
CC: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>
CC: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
CC: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
@@ -403,6 +403,8 @@ void __init mem_init(void)
{
if (swiotlb_force || max_pfn > (arm64_dma_phys_limit >> PAGE_SHIFT))
swiotlb_init(1);
+ else
+ swiotlb_force = SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE;
set_max_mapnr(pfn_to_page(max_pfn) - mem_map);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from agraf@suse.de are
queue-4.9/arm64-fix-swiotlb-fallback-allocation.patch
next reply other threads:[~2017-01-23 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-23 16:02 gregkh [this message]
2017-01-23 16:15 ` Patch "arm64: Fix swiotlb fallback allocation" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-01-23 16:33 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-01-24 7:30 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=148518736110870@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=jszhang@marvell.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.