Re: [PATCH i-g-t] Add atomic modesetting testlist

["Lankhorst, Maarten" <maarten.lankhorst@intel.com>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1348 bytes --]

Rami Ben Hassine schreef op do 26-01-2017 om 16:36 [+0100]:
> From: ramibh <ramix.ben.hassine@intel.com>
> 
> This is atomic modesetting acceptance tests added to
> feat_profile.json. Wating for your feedback.
> 
> ---
>  tests/feat_profile.json | 8 +++++++-
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/feat_profile.json b/tests/feat_profile.json
> index 251dfd9..bba4b3c 100644
> --- a/tests/feat_profile.json
> +++ b/tests/feat_profile.json
> @@ -3,5 +3,11 @@
>          "include_tests" : "psr",
>          "exclude_tests" : "",
>          "target_rate" : 90
> -    }
> +    },
> +    "atomic-modesetting":{
> +        "include_tests" : " kms_atomic_transition kms_atomic
> kms_crtc_background_color kms_cursor_legacy Kms_cursor_crc kms_flip
> kms_flip_event_leak kms_flip_tiling kms_plane kms_plane_lowres
> kms_plane_multiple kms_panel_fitting kms_plane_scaling
> kms_psr_sink_crc kms_rmfb kms_sink_crc_basic testdisplay",
Is the capital K in kms_cursor_crc intentional?

I think adding kms_rotation_crc and kms_universal_plane would be good
too, but since we're already adding most of the kms tests, why don't we
just add all kms tests?
> +        "exclude_tests" : "",
> +        "target_rate" : 90
> +
> +
>  }

[-- Attachment #1.2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 3282 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx