From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io0-f177.google.com (mail-io0-f177.google.com [209.85.223.177]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3338772CF for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 13:29:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f177.google.com with SMTP id j13so106532120iod.3 for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 05:29:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to:references:organization :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nDiA4CnNydSQh/QV6l+YTnxtht24Y4nd534GMaxDfuc=; b=fGEvt/Bl67j2kU2bjAuK+FQAtJjyba2nKlL8WTZp5bqXn+09pB1aK/xImb0HaGL/vO QHRJ1MQmaYV60oPQNZe42DZZY7uZYZlsxrfVop2Fd5EkBGm5TEUOs6Rx3lnUcka8TwVg bbSD+1t9KHREIKyR0VwdDeOy8aUzaIWCMaQ2Efbkie19sVV5DqJEBTN28iS/UZxzjssl fh3EhcsaBu921vaWuFm8AAhqiNe1N8irpQPy0fupXcMVEQIU/Gh5Rsw46RJppfYCc/ax BpP7aiijDWV2cfC1TNMrpuLJ3vGeNqQuodN8D4QTnpKxght0HPGMpclnuyLYZq9Rw+OT ZgrQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nDiA4CnNydSQh/QV6l+YTnxtht24Y4nd534GMaxDfuc=; b=QTDiNzvIatxBcotneT8Ja8U7LrljBRegH9VAmcb7KBGCGt3FqbCMYzjs6pl+mzEQ0B +UU/yZf5CP6C8i9obtlV2VpwfLs6UGGX7s1BVjrA1SlOhclnGe5i96ENfImqCM2tE9Uw fbecpFnyQKPnyLbNmqZQmtI2nYUm0xNIXSsbsInRggPqk81cVgq+xpjS9HHRCzPYcJAl hq6JJhaYVi9Xkk4o2f/+P2b27EGEdLMmjS64UAXhCNVYo2sR8DWDw+EaUa48DzbWD+Ls m99ZNatO+oh4GdcPSVB6ftiB0BhyT3TRBZTP+I3+zzzLm5OJagOG1Acqf0boXjpJv/oN caoQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKvyEOB2L/zz6bryBbd3mTKlJ0Gdku77etAg8PKOUE5od0XYsE5EQ4zzWGueSFE+aJW X-Received: by 10.107.173.133 with SMTP id m5mr19079575ioo.186.1485782984277; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 05:29:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from pohly-mobl1 (p5DE8CDEB.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.232.205.235]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l3sm8174011ioa.31.2017.01.30.05.29.42 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 30 Jan 2017 05:29:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1485782980.20333.132.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 14:29:40 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20170130121805.GA13746@jama> References: <20170127101200.25785-1-patrick.ohly@intel.com> <20170130121805.GA13746@jama> Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] multipath-tools: update to 0.6.4 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 13:29:46 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2017-01-30 at 13:18 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 11:11:23AM +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > No particular reason for updating besides following upstream. > > > > Only kpartx has been tested after updating! Seems to work as before; > > unfortunately that means that as in 0.5.0, "kpartx -d" doesn't do > > anything. > > > > Upstream refreshed the COPYING file, hence the checksum change: > > $ git log --oneline 0.5.0..HEAD COPYING > > bf05f63 multipath-tools: replace COPYING with a fresh copy from gnu.org > > 1d6c88a Update FSF address > > > > The QA error that do-not-link-libmpathpersist-to-TMPDIR.patch fixes > > no longer occurs because upstream changed that particular part of > > the Makefile. > > > > A new patch is needed to avoid building libcheckerrdb, which depends > > on the (currently) unavailable librados. > > FWIW: it would be even better if you mark > https://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/136518/ > as Superseded as patchwork is where I take patches for master-next and I > need to remember that there was e-mail reply for this one that it should > be ignored. Thanks, I'll try to remember that going forward. Would have been a nice testcase for [Patchwork-Status: Superseded] -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.