From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: f.fainelli@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "net: systemport: Decouple flow control from __bcm_sysport_tx_reclaim" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 09:11:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <148593671651190@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
net: systemport: Decouple flow control from __bcm_sysport_tx_reclaim
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
net-systemport-decouple-flow-control-from-__bcm_sysport_tx_reclaim.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From foo@baz Wed Feb 1 08:50:24 CET 2017
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:09:09 -0800
Subject: net: systemport: Decouple flow control from __bcm_sysport_tx_reclaim
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
[ Upstream commit 148d3d021cf9724fcf189ce4e525a094bbf5ce89 ]
The __bcm_sysport_tx_reclaim() function is used to reclaim transmit
resources in different places within the driver. Most of them should
not affect the state of the transit flow control.
Introduce bcm_sysport_tx_clean() which cleans the ring, but does not
re-enable flow control towards the networking stack, and make
bcm_sysport_tx_reclaim() do the actual transmit queue flow control.
Fixes: 80105befdb4b ("net: systemport: add Broadcom SYSTEMPORT Ethernet MAC driver")
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bcmsysport.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bcmsysport.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bcmsysport.c
@@ -710,11 +710,8 @@ static unsigned int __bcm_sysport_tx_rec
unsigned int c_index, last_c_index, last_tx_cn, num_tx_cbs;
unsigned int pkts_compl = 0, bytes_compl = 0;
struct bcm_sysport_cb *cb;
- struct netdev_queue *txq;
u32 hw_ind;
- txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(ndev, ring->index);
-
/* Compute how many descriptors have been processed since last call */
hw_ind = tdma_readl(priv, TDMA_DESC_RING_PROD_CONS_INDEX(ring->index));
c_index = (hw_ind >> RING_CONS_INDEX_SHIFT) & RING_CONS_INDEX_MASK;
@@ -745,9 +742,6 @@ static unsigned int __bcm_sysport_tx_rec
ring->c_index = c_index;
- if (netif_tx_queue_stopped(txq) && pkts_compl)
- netif_tx_wake_queue(txq);
-
netif_dbg(priv, tx_done, ndev,
"ring=%d c_index=%d pkts_compl=%d, bytes_compl=%d\n",
ring->index, ring->c_index, pkts_compl, bytes_compl);
@@ -759,16 +753,33 @@ static unsigned int __bcm_sysport_tx_rec
static unsigned int bcm_sysport_tx_reclaim(struct bcm_sysport_priv *priv,
struct bcm_sysport_tx_ring *ring)
{
+ struct netdev_queue *txq;
unsigned int released;
unsigned long flags;
+ txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(priv->netdev, ring->index);
+
spin_lock_irqsave(&ring->lock, flags);
released = __bcm_sysport_tx_reclaim(priv, ring);
+ if (released)
+ netif_tx_wake_queue(txq);
+
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ring->lock, flags);
return released;
}
+/* Locked version of the per-ring TX reclaim, but does not wake the queue */
+static void bcm_sysport_tx_clean(struct bcm_sysport_priv *priv,
+ struct bcm_sysport_tx_ring *ring)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&ring->lock, flags);
+ __bcm_sysport_tx_reclaim(priv, ring);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ring->lock, flags);
+}
+
static int bcm_sysport_tx_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
{
struct bcm_sysport_tx_ring *ring =
@@ -1253,7 +1264,7 @@ static void bcm_sysport_fini_tx_ring(str
napi_disable(&ring->napi);
netif_napi_del(&ring->napi);
- bcm_sysport_tx_reclaim(priv, ring);
+ bcm_sysport_tx_clean(priv, ring);
kfree(ring->cbs);
ring->cbs = NULL;
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from f.fainelli@gmail.com are
queue-4.9/net-systemport-decouple-flow-control-from-__bcm_sysport_tx_reclaim.patch
queue-4.9/net-dsa-bring-back-device-detaching-in-dsa_slave_suspend.patch
queue-4.9/net-phy-bcm63xx-utilize-correct-config_intr-function.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-02-01 8:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=148593671651190@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.