From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-f46.google.com (mail-it0-f46.google.com [209.85.214.46]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A07B2700F3 for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 21:49:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f46.google.com with SMTP id c7so21590774itd.1 for ; Fri, 03 Feb 2017 13:49:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RCqkJdQ8wAtnFvnV+IwXtrqjV7iIJaxt674YI9xawCg=; b=fcnReBf3qzN5wQ0SIQ4YIZbwOBbULoLkqobSgETNBT8XgULJCUZzRB41q8jOXpeC5d KDQKcjL1l6U4w4ZeuFWtCpSgvfiEmC7pk0qnqmQuWqbuon8pi3h0jCU97PHgtKEsZDBR jZF1lEvBAiR2ZlKBncDPtuRl/RWexQOFZ67xhZ5w/OtTH7furHaKrKJwob7W1xIBktfJ VswM8kTWft79e+VMr64+MlmuO2UHbZbIjNL0qQ7w17O6mLYqD6l3+73uMKHvlmjE+ttE latYeB+VKlG2wAPEaqxvf9IYik0IPwz+pkdHJjJNL5O6AxeR1QM21SGCBxYAMTNQ+H+R wcbg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RCqkJdQ8wAtnFvnV+IwXtrqjV7iIJaxt674YI9xawCg=; b=XLMPFFKhoMQaQsyoWXQjHwb1tM1eZo1uE7qd0mw6bWzTjbUAFXnynYkEfjw5lnEQO4 FOPWRfcfAVeR4E1HnBSk8cA23jyeiYdrGZ6pkjpZWka8A6wMhmO0meZvMGe+HConRmwl 8NjRU+MzoveMkYaVoNcUNpuiR3mNxRTcnwOVIU5gbYCX+FE8nNRfksfWx/hilj+SQkbU hkO0Eoi0I9oT/5YbqUguLi+vYSYbZVhW+mXxrXffwYd513i6yFD5FwgpKk0oD2NIJsNp 0ML+S07TzbhkeO4gtxT7v2DYhuOpCPnT8UDwtBEGknV+ZzG9bMVKdZwKgOGr3u3HADLD jmbg== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXL8Ky5Rb7KrKYjXnGwb6IePbGtYKRXKfjjoJdlvTGmnJQS54C4Q+73QgsqS8p0VPgUl X-Received: by 10.36.252.65 with SMTP id b62mr2715538ith.38.1486158580362; Fri, 03 Feb 2017 13:49:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from pohly-mobl1 (p5DE8E712.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.232.231.18]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a4sm3287674ioa.43.2017.02.03.13.49.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 03 Feb 2017 13:49:38 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1486158576.14889.104.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: "Robert P. J. Day" Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2017 22:49:36 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1486131492.14144.70.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <1486156855.14889.103.camel@intel.com> Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: OE Core mailing list Subject: Re: whatever happened to a proposal for "read-only" sstate? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2017 21:49:41 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2017-02-03 at 16:24 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Fri, 3 Feb 2017, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > > On Fri, 2017-02-03 at 14:14 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > is there a command that will tell you how much shared state info a > > > given build would be able to take advantage of? > > > > INHERIT += "buildstats-summary" in local.conf will print that > > information after a build is done. > > but not before? ok, that will do for now. It might do that also for a "bitbake --dry-run", but I am not sure, and my build directory is currently busy, so I can't test it. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.