From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "pinctrl: baytrail: Add missing spinlock usage in byt_gpio_irq_handler" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2017 10:16:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <148619981039159@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
pinctrl: baytrail: Add missing spinlock usage in byt_gpio_irq_handler
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
pinctrl-baytrail-add-missing-spinlock-usage-in-byt_gpio_irq_handler.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From cdca06e4e85974d8a3503ab15709dbbaf90d3dd1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 12:35:28 +0100
Subject: pinctrl: baytrail: Add missing spinlock usage in byt_gpio_irq_handler
From: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com>
commit cdca06e4e85974d8a3503ab15709dbbaf90d3dd1 upstream.
According to VLI64 Intel Atom E3800 Specification Update (#329901)
concurrent read accesses may result in returning 0xffffffff and write
accesses may be dropped silently.
To workaround all accesses must be protected by locks.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com>
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c
@@ -1612,7 +1612,9 @@ static void byt_gpio_irq_handler(struct
continue;
}
+ raw_spin_lock(&vg->lock);
pending = readl(reg);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&vg->lock);
for_each_set_bit(pin, &pending, 32) {
virq = irq_find_mapping(vg->chip.irqdomain, base + pin);
generic_handle_irq(virq);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com are
queue-4.9/pinctrl-baytrail-add-missing-spinlock-usage-in-byt_gpio_irq_handler.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-02-04 9:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=148619981039159@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.