From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.25.77.65 with SMTP id a62csp2047194lfb; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 23:42:54 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.55.162.138 with SMTP id l132mr12804720qke.204.1486453374717; Mon, 06 Feb 2017 23:42:54 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org. [2001:4830:134:3::11]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p130si2372215qka.10.2017.02.06.23.42.54 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 06 Feb 2017 23:42:54 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org designates 2001:4830:134:3::11 as permitted sender) client-ip=2001:4830:134:3::11; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org designates 2001:4830:134:3::11 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:52445 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cb0QO-0002HA-9P for alex.bennee@linaro.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 02:42:52 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50785) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cb0QJ-0002Gt-8d for qemu-arm@nongnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 02:42:48 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cb0QG-0004Ne-5o for qemu-arm@nongnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 02:42:47 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:51302) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cb0QG-0004Mn-0P for qemu-arm@nongnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 02:42:44 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx16.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB7E0624A9; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 07:42:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nilsson.home.kraxel.org (ovpn-116-105.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.105]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D80516A73; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 07:42:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by nilsson.home.kraxel.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 8F19C8084E; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 08:42:40 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <1486453360.24589.14.camel@redhat.com> From: Gerd Hoffmann To: Icenowy Zheng Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 08:42:40 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20170207000824.8L0ShHJx@smtp1m.mail.yandex.net> References: <20170207000824.8L0ShHJx@smtp1m.mail.yandex.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.74 on 10.5.11.28 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.39]); Tue, 07 Feb 2017 07:42:44 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH 1/2] usb/ehci: Add SysBus EHCI device for Allwinner SoCs X-BeenThere: qemu-arm@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Beniamino Galvani , Peter Maydell , qemu-arm@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-arm" X-TUID: c0BvWS7BP9aM On Mo, 2017-01-30 at 21:59 +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > 2017=E5=B9=B41=E6=9C=8830=E6=97=A5 16:19=E4=BA=8E Gerd Hoffmann =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > > > > On So, 2017-01-29 at 09:00 +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:=20 > > > It uses a register map like the one in Exynos SoCs.=20 > > >=20 > > > Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng =20 > > > > I guess this goes through the arm queue?=20 >=20 > I don't know about the QEMU development process, sorry. The question was for Peter who maintains the arm queue. And as patch 2/2 (which clearly belongs to arm) depends on 1/2 it is easier to just take both through the same queue even though 2/2 is a usb patch. cheers, Gerd