From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io0-f170.google.com (mail-io0-f170.google.com [209.85.223.170]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3862A600EB for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 19:10:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f170.google.com with SMTP id v96so98053533ioi.0 for ; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 11:10:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to:references:organization :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dQmVb+rn22PkkU2GoL1aKjyCBOyIe/JzyP9nUSWhCBA=; b=0yWLFB8cUaa47l4oCtTQYb81DOiYVtVvOrnbbZIqBpVZNQxaxZ9kMJ1PQZT+S8f6Un K1yWbZjz3TJRR6y8cbhdA9ySrz3TXf8ZvuK9PRR+6DKNTyks4h9LbJU+sWP4F05/flO5 CH2MrZo9ub+9VGormwQG13YqjF3s6V7NH/wmfD0EjG9fqkVLZHDL/2/O7fW618usAymg ENR7MfOtQTMAkD/GUb5m1Z1n2Pf/AEarWEyCXgixuiLRuNhtdsx3/ESktiJXCMAzbLgV mS6OwiLsvKIRLP+2utwVOIcZw5PJD2vxCNsBPLM0mpvnLcmsNvdrRV9Eky4eSofmJJdG wVYQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dQmVb+rn22PkkU2GoL1aKjyCBOyIe/JzyP9nUSWhCBA=; b=I8DO2ghfq2AV7CfYXLrRHQTVFNzztYE5CVXLnyrtFZeqM5Lw81WSoLbJIXdR0Edqrj x5MKh7CoKDYa11tBQTZqvJIjvCl7MsLSh8geSPRm0ndBV07FGUqTvXWBHdCRqtJ7jZAv pvgsramMwA/KApl6iTFg18nrptSEkkxwz/RBtr5midopi+C5YOPp1xGl7zIYLAbXVdiQ mkcamojFsy74AYbh9H+SZ2bZcbf0FUke+ajQa0YnBEySHac+gekxYjDG76YFZ1oeCGpb Db87vVD2FhVuk5NAsQLyrPMtijkPdXV4S2za21XA3w5Y38dQ0167pMUOCxHJpHAHnEtA 72nw== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39n+egNlXQLIAGJQqk2O3CrQP+GzUbImuP62/Qyoa4yL0khkC5rcWXVlWI/7j9TRKihG X-Received: by 10.107.186.136 with SMTP id k130mr5599538iof.195.1486494650585; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 11:10:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from pohly-mobl1 (p5DE8DF93.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.232.223.147]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j74sm9976125iod.44.2017.02.07.11.10.48 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 07 Feb 2017 11:10:49 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1486494646.14889.144.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 20:10:46 +0100 In-Reply-To: <17a923eb-ec4b-1401-8277-cba1ddd1aae0@linux.intel.com> References: <1486399174-28949-1-git-send-email-akuster808@gmail.com> <1486453274.14889.135.camel@intel.com> <20170207102518.GA3276@jama> <1486465148.14889.140.camel@intel.com> <17a923eb-ec4b-1401-8277-cba1ddd1aae0@linux.intel.com> Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Patchwork-Status via email X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 19:10:51 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 12:32 -0600, Jose Lamego wrote: > > On 02/07/2017 04:59 AM, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > What about this use case here: the original author wants to retract a > > patch. Can he do that via email and/or the web interface? > > > Patch submitter (and project maintainers) can update status manually > through the web interface. I suspect that this makes the email interface less useful that it could be. May I suggest that we relax the permission check so that also patch authors can change the status of a patch? -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.