From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bart Van Assche Subject: Re: [RFC v3 00/11] HFI Virtual Network Interface Controller (VNIC) Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 21:58:50 +0000 Message-ID: <1486504716.2581.8.camel@sandisk.com> References: <1486498990-76562-1-git-send-email-niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com> <1486502926.2581.4.camel@sandisk.com> <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A82373AB0E5B6C@ORSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A82373AB0E5B6C@ORSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com> Content-Language: en-US Content-ID: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "dledford@redhat.com" , "sean.hefty@intel.com" , "niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com" Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" , "dennis.dalessandro@intel.com" , "ira.weiny@intel.com" List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 21:44 +0000, Hefty, Sean wrote: > This is Ethernet - not IP - encapsulation over a non-InfiniBand device/protocol. That's more than clear from the cover letter. In my opinion the cover letter should explain why it is considered useful to have such a driver upstream and what the use cases are of encapsulating Ethernet frames inside RDMA packets. Bart.