From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB143C43458 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2026 12:44:21 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH] classes-recipe/sbom-cve-check: fix sstate cache mismatch in sbom path To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org From: "Anna-Lena Marx" X-Originating-Location: DE (185.113.124.99) X-Originating-Platform: Linux Chrome 148 User-Agent: GROUPS.IO Web Poster MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2026 05:44:13 -0700 References: <20260701100045.3903557-1-anna-lena.marx@inovex.de> In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <148656.1782909853265533546@lists.openembedded.org> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="YN8Fr11mczyuIL1f4u5s" List-Id: X-Webhook-Received: from 45-33-107-173.ip.linodeusercontent.com [45.33.107.173] by aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org with HTTPS for ; Wed, 01 Jul 2026 12:44:21 -0000 X-Groupsio-URL: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/239981 --YN8Fr11mczyuIL1f4u5s Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Peter, I'm a bit confused about your patch, not that I would not believe it solves= the issue, but IMAGE_LINK_NAME is defined as `IMAGE_LINK_NAME ?=3D "${IMAGE_BASENAME}${IMAGE_MACHINE_SUFFIX}"` and IMAGE_NAME as `IMAGE_NAME ?=3D "${IMAGE_LINK_NAME}${IMAGE_VERSION_SUFFIX}"` means, if I'm not completely confused, if IMAGE_LINK_NAME would be empty fo= r some reason, IMAGE_NAME, would only consist of the IMAGE_VERSION_SUFFIX. This does not read correct to me as well, and thus I'm not completely enthu= siastic about your version. But I'm completely with you in terms of the main issue and would rather lik= e to fix it on this level than patching symptoms. Anna --YN8Fr11mczyuIL1f4u5s Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Peter,
 
I'm a bit confused about your patch, not that I would not believe it s= olves the issue, but IMAGE_LINK_NAME is defined as 

`IMAGE_= LINK_NAME ?=3D "${IMAGE_BASENAME}${IMAGE_MACHINE_SUFFIX}"`

and I= MAGE_NAME as

`IMAGE_NAME ?=3D "${IMAGE_LINK_NAME}${IMAGE_VERSION= _SUFFIX}"`

means, if I'm not completely confused, if IMAGE_LINK_= NAME would be empty for some reason, IMAGE_NAME, would only consist of the = IMAGE_VERSION_SUFFIX.
This does not read correct to me as well, and th= us I'm not completely enthusiastic about your version.

But I'm c= ompletely with you in terms of the main issue and would rather like to fix = it on this level than patching symptoms.

Anna
--YN8Fr11mczyuIL1f4u5s--