From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-f50.google.com (mail-it0-f50.google.com [209.85.214.50]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7BED601D3 for ; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 17:12:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f50.google.com with SMTP id c7so20884226itd.1 for ; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 09:12:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to:references:organization :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=adS7mEszfHvlaBHWeQD85h3i+M6T6ScEQnFd9pgSrSw=; b=fSDuvuxBpnPS4pT49/Z24OC7hD9xdnipXvKH3a+RMYKY3wzY0qrjjFfkx7E6S0TCab 8HmnKLkKA3JF0qe0QRVCPu6KHyI4cjDtlpXzdR1iNRel71hbyra3y7pMB3YveszKkjq0 6Y89BmrAEhvzNNi8AzUDXlkxbI6Oxc9mtr0XyoC3l//M6/fRu/CGolxAQu06haJiJ8zk 7zU7OkHaMdVZf+Djc03XdH9NtyAXMYOcHcyRRYro9ogEJ0CAB7/Ep4q3YNIcWigiAN/L vlMScFjvfz1M64/SgCcmIC0zYBFRjs7bX78xUZy5Kfka6OE1RMsb9v+k9wGeUA6aNqVg nCxg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=adS7mEszfHvlaBHWeQD85h3i+M6T6ScEQnFd9pgSrSw=; b=opCmDYpNoOuw4LvZ1kb0HiAo0UGG3XkTI7qjO1X1NLS2x8qisEvs06EXnshxik/KFv EwwwK/YPb4LX329YcD8a+iSXJCqsFPv9yyBtu473aFU8H07QUnMzQqOp9XjPDNMff+k4 sE8zEYxY8yn8FRVb2Fir1qG8Owt4VAjUb/EyJqv14+47tAS9A2bM8fdRV7Al0ZXsQZPV V3Y7e+qiCB59fqiMtZ98Zpvvy+NW1XOKyHdN4+SKBJKT7Z4PL+ZioRlHzmPS98bq1CJU VbPzIh1SK0J+rT8OeoMzCxqe/ak100GxNn2NJyrO0vPGYFwbTG5ttZMJONUQAWI8sONe fjhw== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIilZweEmfYg+MpiPrYHqutEWWWJfTggy12tR0yyXUPHQP4tqiS+K4H5e87YMZ99VcA X-Received: by 10.36.107.194 with SMTP id v185mr22277112itc.59.1486660322220; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 09:12:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from pohly-mobl1 (p5DE8DC0B.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.232.220.11]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o13sm3184778ith.5.2017.02.09.09.12.00 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 09 Feb 2017 09:12:00 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1486660318.13854.105.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2017 18:11:58 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [meta-oe][PATCH 1/4] lvm2: remove unbuildable 2.02.138 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2017 17:12:02 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2017-02-08 at 20:21 +0000, Khem Raj wrote: > Can you check if this is the last gpl2 version According to the recipe, both 2.02.138 and 2.02.166 are under LICENSE = "GPLv2 & LGPLv2", and that also seems to be what the current code is licensed under: https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/lvm2.git/tree/ So GPLv2 vs. GPLv3 wasn't the reason for keeping the old version. BTW, do all mails from openembedded-devel have Reply-To: set? openembedded-core doesn't seem to have that. I have a mail filter in place which will bring personal replies to my attention sooner, but Reply-To to the list defeats that. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.