From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: tj@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
martin.steigerwald@teamix.de, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "cpumask: use nr_cpumask_bits for parsing functions" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 22:10:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1486761034183249@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
cpumask: use nr_cpumask_bits for parsing functions
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
cpumask-use-nr_cpumask_bits-for-parsing-functions.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 4d59b6ccf000862beed6fc0765d3209f98a8d8a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 14:30:56 -0800
Subject: cpumask: use nr_cpumask_bits for parsing functions
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
commit 4d59b6ccf000862beed6fc0765d3209f98a8d8a2 upstream.
Commit 513e3d2d11c9 ("cpumask: always use nr_cpu_ids in formatting and
parsing functions") converted both cpumask printing and parsing
functions to use nr_cpu_ids instead of nr_cpumask_bits. While this was
okay for the printing functions as it just picked one of the two output
formats that we were alternating between depending on a kernel config,
doing the same for parsing wasn't okay.
nr_cpumask_bits can be either nr_cpu_ids or NR_CPUS. We can always use
nr_cpu_ids but that is a variable while NR_CPUS is a constant, so it can
be more efficient to use NR_CPUS when we can get away with it.
Converting the printing functions to nr_cpu_ids makes sense because it
affects how the masks get presented to userspace and doesn't break
anything; however, using nr_cpu_ids for parsing functions can
incorrectly leave the higher bits uninitialized while reading in these
masks from userland. As all testing and comparison functions use
nr_cpumask_bits which can be larger than nr_cpu_ids, the parsed cpumasks
can erroneously yield false negative results.
This made the taskstats interface incorrectly return -EINVAL even when
the inputs were correct.
Fix it by restoring the parse functions to use nr_cpumask_bits instead
of nr_cpu_ids.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170206182442.GB31078@htj.duckdns.org
Fixes: 513e3d2d11c9 ("cpumask: always use nr_cpu_ids in formatting and parsing functions")
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reported-by: Martin Steigerwald <martin.steigerwald@teamix.de>
Debugged-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
include/linux/cpumask.h | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/cpumask.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h
@@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ static inline void cpumask_copy(struct c
static inline int cpumask_parse_user(const char __user *buf, int len,
struct cpumask *dstp)
{
- return bitmap_parse_user(buf, len, cpumask_bits(dstp), nr_cpu_ids);
+ return bitmap_parse_user(buf, len, cpumask_bits(dstp), nr_cpumask_bits);
}
/**
@@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ static inline int cpumask_parselist_user
struct cpumask *dstp)
{
return bitmap_parselist_user(buf, len, cpumask_bits(dstp),
- nr_cpu_ids);
+ nr_cpumask_bits);
}
/**
@@ -590,7 +590,7 @@ static inline int cpumask_parse(const ch
char *nl = strchr(buf, '\n');
unsigned int len = nl ? (unsigned int)(nl - buf) : strlen(buf);
- return bitmap_parse(buf, len, cpumask_bits(dstp), nr_cpu_ids);
+ return bitmap_parse(buf, len, cpumask_bits(dstp), nr_cpumask_bits);
}
/**
@@ -602,7 +602,7 @@ static inline int cpumask_parse(const ch
*/
static inline int cpulist_parse(const char *buf, struct cpumask *dstp)
{
- return bitmap_parselist(buf, cpumask_bits(dstp), nr_cpu_ids);
+ return bitmap_parselist(buf, cpumask_bits(dstp), nr_cpumask_bits);
}
/**
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from tj@kernel.org are
queue-4.9/cpumask-use-nr_cpumask_bits-for-parsing-functions.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-02-10 21:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1486761034183249@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk \
--cc=martin.steigerwald@teamix.de \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.