From: Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [meta-oe][PATCH 1/4] lvm2: remove unbuildable 2.02.138
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 08:23:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1486970621.13854.191.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+chaQdusR+PaaJNB8gp0nqrmV+rRUos+SCiXN1Z3aCUiKHGFw@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, 2017-02-11 at 00:15 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote:
> It seems to be buildable when you add:
>
> EXTRA_OECONF += "--disable-selinux \
> --with-cluster=none \
> "
> at least that's what one of my .bbappends does.
That's odd, for me it is do_patch which fails already, i.e. configure
arguments aren't even used:
ERROR: lvm2-2.02.138-r0 do_patch: Command Error: 'quilt
--quiltrc /fast/build/refkit/intel-corei7-64/tmp-glibc/work/corei7-64-refkit-linux/lvm2/2.02.138-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/etc/quiltrc push' exited with 0 Output:
Applying patch 0001-implement-libc-specific-reopen_stream.patch
patching file lib/log/log.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 161.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 209 with fuzz 2 (offset 2 lines).
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file lib/log/log.c
patching file tools/lvmcmdline.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1744 (offset -74 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 1754 (offset -74 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 1762 (offset -74 lines).
Patch 0001-implement-libc-specific-reopen_stream.patch does not apply
(enforce with -f)
ERROR: lvm2-2.02.138-r0 do_patch: Function failed: patch_do_patch
ERROR: Logfile of failure stored
in: /fast/build/refkit/intel-corei7-64/tmp-glibc/work/corei7-64-refkit-linux/lvm2/2.02.138-r0/temp/log.do_patch.2472
ERROR: Task
(/work/iot-ref-kit//meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-support/lvm2/lvm2_2.02.138.bb:do_patch) failed with exit code '1'
Perhaps that is one of those cases where it depends on the native patch
tool whether patching still works?
Anyway, the changes that I'd like to see merged are the others. So if
there's no consensus that 2.02.138 can and/or should be removed, let's
keep it.
--
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-13 7:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-08 9:37 [meta-oe][PATCH 0/4] native cryptsetup and fuse Patrick Ohly
2017-02-08 9:37 ` [meta-oe][PATCH 1/4] lvm2: remove unbuildable 2.02.138 Patrick Ohly
2017-02-08 20:21 ` Khem Raj
2017-02-09 17:11 ` Patrick Ohly
2017-02-09 17:17 ` Khem Raj
2017-02-09 19:21 ` Reply-To (was: Re: [meta-oe][PATCH 1/4] lvm2: remove unbuildable 2.02.138) Patrick Ohly
2017-02-10 23:15 ` [meta-oe][PATCH 1/4] lvm2: remove unbuildable 2.02.138 Martin Jansa
2017-02-13 7:23 ` Patrick Ohly [this message]
2017-02-08 9:37 ` [meta-oe][PATCH 2/4] fuse: support native compilation Patrick Ohly
2017-02-08 9:37 ` [meta-oe][PATCH 3/4] lvm2: enable " Patrick Ohly
2017-02-08 9:37 ` [meta-oe][PATCH 4/4] cryptsetup: " Patrick Ohly
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1486970621.13854.191.camel@intel.com \
--to=patrick.ohly@intel.com \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.