From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: osandov@fb.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, mingo@kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "stacktrace, lockdep: Fix address, newline ugliness" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 04:17:04 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1486988224114225@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
stacktrace, lockdep: Fix address, newline ugliness
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
stacktrace-lockdep-fix-address-newline-ugliness.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From bfeda41d06d85ad9d52f2413cfc2b77be5022f75 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 15:33:20 -0800
Subject: stacktrace, lockdep: Fix address, newline ugliness
From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
commit bfeda41d06d85ad9d52f2413cfc2b77be5022f75 upstream.
Since KERN_CONT became meaningful again, lockdep stack traces have had
annoying extra newlines, like this:
[ 5.561122] -> #1 (B){+.+...}:
[ 5.561528]
[ 5.561532] [<ffffffff810d8873>] lock_acquire+0xc3/0x210
[ 5.562178]
[ 5.562181] [<ffffffff816f6414>] mutex_lock_nested+0x74/0x6d0
[ 5.562861]
[ 5.562880] [<ffffffffa01aa3c3>] init_btrfs_fs+0x21/0x196 [btrfs]
[ 5.563717]
[ 5.563721] [<ffffffff81000472>] do_one_initcall+0x52/0x1b0
[ 5.564554]
[ 5.564559] [<ffffffff811a3af6>] do_init_module+0x5f/0x209
[ 5.565357]
[ 5.565361] [<ffffffff81122f4d>] load_module+0x218d/0x2b80
[ 5.566020]
[ 5.566021] [<ffffffff81123beb>] SyS_finit_module+0xeb/0x120
[ 5.566694]
[ 5.566696] [<ffffffff816fd241>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1f/0xc2
That's happening because each printk() call now gets printed on its own
line, and we do a separate call to print the spaces before the symbol.
Fix it by doing the printk() directly instead of using the
print_ip_sym() helper.
Additionally, the symbol address isn't very helpful, so let's get rid of
that, too. The final result looks like this:
[ 5.194518] -> #1 (B){+.+...}:
[ 5.195002] lock_acquire+0xc3/0x210
[ 5.195439] mutex_lock_nested+0x74/0x6d0
[ 5.196491] do_one_initcall+0x52/0x1b0
[ 5.196939] do_init_module+0x5f/0x209
[ 5.197355] load_module+0x218d/0x2b80
[ 5.197792] SyS_finit_module+0xeb/0x120
[ 5.198251] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1f/0xc2
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: kernel-team@fb.com
Fixes: 4bcc595ccd80 ("printk: reinstate KERN_CONT for printing continuation lines")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/43b4e114724b2bdb0308fa86cb33aa07d3d67fad.1486510315.git.osandov@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/stacktrace.c | 12 ++++--------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -18,10 +18,8 @@ void print_stack_trace(struct stack_trac
if (WARN_ON(!trace->entries))
return;
- for (i = 0; i < trace->nr_entries; i++) {
- printk("%*c", 1 + spaces, ' ');
- print_ip_sym(trace->entries[i]);
- }
+ for (i = 0; i < trace->nr_entries; i++)
+ printk("%*c%pS\n", 1 + spaces, ' ', (void *)trace->entries[i]);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(print_stack_trace);
@@ -29,7 +27,6 @@ int snprint_stack_trace(char *buf, size_
struct stack_trace *trace, int spaces)
{
int i;
- unsigned long ip;
int generated;
int total = 0;
@@ -37,9 +34,8 @@ int snprint_stack_trace(char *buf, size_
return 0;
for (i = 0; i < trace->nr_entries; i++) {
- ip = trace->entries[i];
- generated = snprintf(buf, size, "%*c[<%p>] %pS\n",
- 1 + spaces, ' ', (void *) ip, (void *) ip);
+ generated = snprintf(buf, size, "%*c%pS\n", 1 + spaces, ' ',
+ (void *)trace->entries[i]);
total += generated;
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from osandov@fb.com are
queue-4.9/stacktrace-lockdep-fix-address-newline-ugliness.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-02-13 12:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1486988224114225@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=osandov@fb.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.