From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-f50.google.com (mail-it0-f50.google.com [209.85.214.50]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64D8765C8F for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 17:28:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f50.google.com with SMTP id c7so41013334itd.1 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 09:28:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DTn0WRfUFuxobInChPgsarDbV7rUpDd8Wp8mggIR3Lk=; b=IeLm8JR+g5LSXy7OXa/HUplNbu4CMP+BFhx2sTHLcrzVkvJNG+mEhUpD2Aazm5oKoe 2jhUFXVEvyBTqiJ+7rFHlJhxb0E0AbsHaI8rOZ4uKRUXfbfzwEBO6+7qMkORWmuS3CH7 +8cu5LHbQX41JASIbFdGrssfctmPsRWOS9vSHr2ge1N6BRuhmlXMKl9j6bRYKu+czlqX 0ow8fxdPyHBZH45BnOsEJuJKgy21Wd9vlpacayOokt5oUAau/pF0dKWA5z95Suced3Id CGkQo+82J6vmFHw3l6DzkNnlP4ty0Q5vZ3yYeT/MZAnW0WIXIlcnMVCn6fHhF29XxB3d J1XA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DTn0WRfUFuxobInChPgsarDbV7rUpDd8Wp8mggIR3Lk=; b=kXVbYlMSUb0dII9YroVXy+UaYYS8juayzDlokpLnBCjVtxCR1l08Pyk1xcRMfYQk9h YW5L7kIyxQ1q7Iz6uqd+zrs0Cb2n0ZMu5wZezU3yQien0m16RfP43tzj3eUU6Zk8kYW0 VRBlQ7TTN2UEpPgUOMfSfkQMticzIaKtuLKD3xLQKtGgjJsNt+VFDY5ZQZ07xEoW0Wu3 nTJHdupIYsj3IoHZkhzL4VwACrswGY4OPkYZZojFwoLk3ri0n/FOTvsrQsl52Ev1wjie lvyunwvHNC9vTzo3RtSTl0CTTeXkKQXdfuMum7yq6RtSEgXiXaRE47mz8x3yB4fJ5tmx 7w+Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nuh69ZeUwd/GI0GT3LIh3Q68gfUk/xm26VEo44lqcG2hmfDN8zWVkAfh9pHevjuNKp X-Received: by 10.107.198.195 with SMTP id w186mr27567822iof.19.1487093293808; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 09:28:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from pohly-mobl1 (p5DE8E015.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.232.224.21]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f188sm1550681itf.9.2017.02.14.09.28.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 14 Feb 2017 09:28:12 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1487093290.13854.355.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: Martin Jansa Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 18:28:10 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1487086509.13854.347.camel@intel.com> References: <20170210082811.GA3021@jama> <1487086509.13854.347.camel@intel.com> Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: multipath-tools on arm (was: Re: [OE-core] State of bitbake world, Failed tasks 2017-02-08) X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 17:28:15 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit [dropping OE-core mailing list] On Tue, 2017-02-14 at 16:35 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: > On Fri, 2017-02-10 at 09:28 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > > * > > meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-support/multipath-tools/multipath-tools_git.bb:do_compile > > This is http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/130529/ and now > blacklisted with the comment "Fails to build with RSS > http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/130529/" > > However, the error isn't about RSS. It looks like an inline-assembler or > compiler bug: > > {standard input}: Assembler messages: > {standard input}:80: Error: shifts in CMP/MOV instructions are only supported in unified syntax -- `mov r12,r12,ror#3' > {standard input}:80: Error: shifts in CMP/MOV instructions are only supported in unified syntax -- `mov r12,r12,ror#13' > ... > ../Makefile.inc:66: recipe for target 'debug.o' failed > make[1]: *** [debug.o] Error 1 > > Does anyone know what this could be? I'll also fire up a build in the > meantime. I've not been able to reproduce that error based on current Poky (OE-Core d1109378d73, bitbake 95deecab, meta-openembedded 044e518954), neither with DISTRO = "poky" nor without it :-/ Martin, can we try reverting this in meta-openembedded to see whether the problem comes back? -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.