From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Johannes Berg <johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: HE (11ax) extensions
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 10:05:25 +0100
Message-ID: <1487149525.4026.16.camel@sipsolutions.net>
References: <1486992211.19813.1.camel@sipsolutions.net>
	 <D96F5F50-5B44-487C-8FF8-36A793960B7D@superduper.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <bounces-radiotap-owner-gnwr-radiotap=gmane.org-sUITvd46vNxg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <D96F5F50-5B44-487C-8FF8-36A793960B7D-vp0mx6+5gkqFX2APIN6yfw@public.gmane.org>
Sender: radiotap-owner-sUITvd46vNxg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org
To: Simon Barber <simon-vp0mx6+5gkqFX2APIN6yfw@public.gmane.org>
Cc: radiotap-S783fYmB3Ccdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org
List-Id: radiotap@radiotap.org

On Mon, 2017-02-13 at 11:33 -0800, Simon Barber wrote:
> For HT and VHT one of the things that is missing is the total length
> of aggregates (including padding) - it’s in the L-SIG header, would
> be nice to have it exposed (since most chipsets pass up everything
> that’s in the header).

Come to think of this - that really should have been part of the A-MPDU 
field, but I don't think it makes sense to put it into an HE extension
either, so it'd probably be better as a separate field.

johannes