From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-f200.google.com (mail-pf0-f200.google.com [209.85.192.200]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62F5C681010 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 14:34:08 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-pf0-f200.google.com with SMTP id 145so34483912pfv.6 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 11:34:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com. [192.55.52.43]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s21si7800931pgh.403.2017.02.16.11.34.07 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 16 Feb 2017 11:34:07 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1487273646.2833.100.camel@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: swap_cluster_info lockdep splat From: Tim Chen Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 11:34:06 -0800 In-Reply-To: References: <20170216052218.GA13908@bbox> <87o9y2a5ji.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Hugh Dickins , "Huang, Ying" Cc: Minchan Kim , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org > I do not understand your zest for putting wrappers around every little > thing, making it all harder to follow than it need be.A Here's the patch > I've been running with (but you have a leak somewhere, and I don't have > time to search out and fix it: please try sustained swapping and swapoff). > Hugh, trying to duplicate your test case. A So you were doing swapping, then swap off, swap on the swap device and restart swapping? Tim -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933097AbdBPTei (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Feb 2017 14:34:38 -0500 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:38225 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932694AbdBPTeh (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Feb 2017 14:34:37 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.35,169,1484035200"; d="scan'208";a="59295120" Message-ID: <1487273646.2833.100.camel@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: swap_cluster_info lockdep splat From: Tim Chen To: Hugh Dickins , "Huang, Ying" Cc: Minchan Kim , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 11:34:06 -0800 In-Reply-To: References: <20170216052218.GA13908@bbox> <87o9y2a5ji.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.2 (3.18.5.2-1.fc23) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I do not understand your zest for putting wrappers around every little > thing, making it all harder to follow than it need be.  Here's the patch > I've been running with (but you have a leak somewhere, and I don't have > time to search out and fix it: please try sustained swapping and swapoff). > Hugh, trying to duplicate your test case.  So you were doing swapping, then swap off, swap on the swap device and restart swapping? Tim