From: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org>
To: vinholikatti@gmail.com, jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
martin.petersen@oracle.com
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/1] scsi: ufs-qcom: remove redundant condition check
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 13:53:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1487368421-22903-1-git-send-email-subhashj@codeaurora.org> (raw)
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> reported this:
---
The patch 9c46b8676271: "scsi: ufs-qcom: dump additional testbus
registers" from Feb 3, 2017, leads to the following static checker
warning:
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c:1531 ufs_qcom_testbus_cfg_is_ok()
warn: impossible condition
'(host->testbus.select_minor > 255) => (0-255 > 255)'
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
1517 static bool ufs_qcom_testbus_cfg_is_ok(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)
1518 {
1519 if (host->testbus.select_major >= TSTBUS_MAX) {
1520 dev_err(host->hba->dev,
1521 "%s: UFS_CFG1[TEST_BUS_SEL} may not equal 0x%05X\n",
1522 __func__, host->testbus.select_major);
1523 return false;
1524 }
1525
1526 /*
1527 * Not performing check for each individual select_major
1528 * mappings of select_minor, since there is no harm in
1529 * configuring a non-existent select_minor
1530 */
1531 if (host->testbus.select_minor > 0xFF) {
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
It might make sense to keep this check. I don't know. But it's
confusing that 0xFF is a magic number. Better to make it a define.
1532 dev_err(host->hba->dev,
1533 "%s: 0x%05X is not a legal testbus option\n",
1534 __func__, host->testbus.select_minor);
1535 return false;
1536 }
1537
1538 return true;
1539 }
---
As data type of "select_minor" is u8, above check is redundant. This change
removes it.
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org>
---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c | 12 ------------
1 file changed, 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
index ce5d023..c87d770 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
@@ -1523,18 +1523,6 @@ static bool ufs_qcom_testbus_cfg_is_ok(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)
return false;
}
- /*
- * Not performing check for each individual select_major
- * mappings of select_minor, since there is no harm in
- * configuring a non-existent select_minor
- */
- if (host->testbus.select_minor > 0xFF) {
- dev_err(host->hba->dev,
- "%s: 0x%05X is not a legal testbus option\n",
- __func__, host->testbus.select_minor);
- return false;
- }
-
return true;
}
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org>
To: vinholikatti@gmail.com, jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
martin.petersen@oracle.com
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/1] scsi: ufs-qcom: remove redundant condition check
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 13:53:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1487368421-22903-1-git-send-email-subhashj@codeaurora.org> (raw)
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> reported this:
---
The patch 9c46b8676271: "scsi: ufs-qcom: dump additional testbus
registers" from Feb 3, 2017, leads to the following static checker
warning:
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c:1531 ufs_qcom_testbus_cfg_is_ok()
warn: impossible condition
'(host->testbus.select_minor > 255) => (0-255 > 255)'
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
1517 static bool ufs_qcom_testbus_cfg_is_ok(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)
1518 {
1519 if (host->testbus.select_major >= TSTBUS_MAX) {
1520 dev_err(host->hba->dev,
1521 "%s: UFS_CFG1[TEST_BUS_SEL} may not equal 0x%05X\n",
1522 __func__, host->testbus.select_major);
1523 return false;
1524 }
1525
1526 /*
1527 * Not performing check for each individual select_major
1528 * mappings of select_minor, since there is no harm in
1529 * configuring a non-existent select_minor
1530 */
1531 if (host->testbus.select_minor > 0xFF) {
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
It might make sense to keep this check. I don't know. But it's
confusing that 0xFF is a magic number. Better to make it a define.
1532 dev_err(host->hba->dev,
1533 "%s: 0x%05X is not a legal testbus option\n",
1534 __func__, host->testbus.select_minor);
1535 return false;
1536 }
1537
1538 return true;
1539 }
---
As data type of "select_minor" is u8, above check is redundant. This change
removes it.
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org>
---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c | 12 ------------
1 file changed, 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
index ce5d023..c87d770 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
@@ -1523,18 +1523,6 @@ static bool ufs_qcom_testbus_cfg_is_ok(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)
return false;
}
- /*
- * Not performing check for each individual select_major
- * mappings of select_minor, since there is no harm in
- * configuring a non-existent select_minor
- */
- if (host->testbus.select_minor > 0xFF) {
- dev_err(host->hba->dev,
- "%s: 0x%05X is not a legal testbus option\n",
- __func__, host->testbus.select_minor);
- return false;
- }
-
return true;
}
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next reply other threads:[~2017-02-17 21:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-17 21:53 Subhash Jadavani [this message]
2017-02-17 21:53 ` [PATCH v1 1/1] scsi: ufs-qcom: remove redundant condition check Subhash Jadavani
2017-02-21 3:06 ` Martin K. Petersen
2017-02-21 3:06 ` Martin K. Petersen
2017-02-22 23:24 ` Subhash Jadavani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1487368421-22903-1-git-send-email-subhashj@codeaurora.org \
--to=subhashj@codeaurora.org \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=vinholikatti@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.