From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SHxYH-0002Zq-Lh for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:25:37 +0200 Received: from azsmga002.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.35]) by azsmga101.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Apr 2012 06:16:05 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,315,1320652800"; d="scan'208";a="87808739" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.120.50]) by AZSMGA002.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Apr 2012 06:16:04 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:15:57 +0100 Message-ID: <1487451.qaDevSNUCm@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.8.2 (Linux/3.0.0-17-generic-pae; KDE/4.8.2; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <1333402513-26781-1-git-send-email-andrea.adami@gmail.com> <6585414.f7e2xNFMXD@helios> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] udev: generalize the check in touchscreen rule X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 13:25:37 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Wednesday 11 April 2012 15:09:10 Andrea Adami wrote: > On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Paul Eggleton > wrote: > > On Wednesday 11 April 2012 13:57:29 Andrea Adami wrote: > >> Finally, bluelightning reported that on ipaq h1940 the rule did not > >> match and added a .bbappend in meta-handheld. > > > > FYI this is because pressure support was removed from the driver. I don't > > know if there's ever hope of it coming back. > > Well, there was a NACKed patch: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/6/23/817 > > Mark Brown: > "It seems much more sane to fix this in tslib, the kernel is not actually > reporting pressure meaningfully here and there's already BTN_TOUCH to > report if the pen is down." Interesting. FWIW, I can report that with a patch to the rule such as this one at least on h1940 the touchscreen works fine, and there was no need to additionally fix anything in tslib. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre