From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: stummala@codeaurora.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, mszeredi@redhat.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "fuse: fix use after free issue in fuse_dev_do_read()" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 06:13:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <14875675967374@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
fuse: fix use after free issue in fuse_dev_do_read()
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
fuse-fix-use-after-free-issue-in-fuse_dev_do_read.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 6ba4d2722d06960102c981322035239cd66f7316 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 20:30:56 +0530
Subject: fuse: fix use after free issue in fuse_dev_do_read()
From: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org>
commit 6ba4d2722d06960102c981322035239cd66f7316 upstream.
There is a potential race between fuse_dev_do_write()
and request_wait_answer() contexts as shown below:
TASK 1:
__fuse_request_send():
|--spin_lock(&fiq->waitq.lock);
|--queue_request();
|--spin_unlock(&fiq->waitq.lock);
|--request_wait_answer():
|--if (test_bit(FR_SENT, &req->flags))
<gets pre-empted after it is validated true>
TASK 2:
fuse_dev_do_write():
|--clears bit FR_SENT,
|--request_end():
|--sets bit FR_FINISHED
|--spin_lock(&fiq->waitq.lock);
|--list_del_init(&req->intr_entry);
|--spin_unlock(&fiq->waitq.lock);
|--fuse_put_request();
|--queue_interrupt();
<request gets queued to interrupts list>
|--wake_up_locked(&fiq->waitq);
|--wait_event_freezable();
<as FR_FINISHED is set, it returns and then
the caller frees this request>
Now, the next fuse_dev_do_read(), see interrupts list is not empty
and then calls fuse_read_interrupt() which tries to access the request
which is already free'd and gets the below crash:
[11432.401266] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address
6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b
...
[11432.418518] Kernel BUG at ffffff80083720e0
[11432.456168] PC is at __list_del_entry+0x6c/0xc4
[11432.463573] LR is at fuse_dev_do_read+0x1ac/0x474
...
[11432.679999] [<ffffff80083720e0>] __list_del_entry+0x6c/0xc4
[11432.687794] [<ffffff80082c65e0>] fuse_dev_do_read+0x1ac/0x474
[11432.693180] [<ffffff80082c6b14>] fuse_dev_read+0x6c/0x78
[11432.699082] [<ffffff80081d5638>] __vfs_read+0xc0/0xe8
[11432.704459] [<ffffff80081d5efc>] vfs_read+0x90/0x108
[11432.709406] [<ffffff80081d67f0>] SyS_read+0x58/0x94
As FR_FINISHED bit is set before deleting the intr_entry with input
queue lock in request completion path, do the testing of this flag and
queueing atomically with the same lock in queue_interrupt().
Signed-off-by: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Fixes: fd22d62ed0c3 ("fuse: no fc->lock for iqueue parts")
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/fuse/dev.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
--- a/fs/fuse/dev.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c
@@ -399,6 +399,10 @@ static void request_end(struct fuse_conn
static void queue_interrupt(struct fuse_iqueue *fiq, struct fuse_req *req)
{
spin_lock(&fiq->waitq.lock);
+ if (test_bit(FR_FINISHED, &req->flags)) {
+ spin_unlock(&fiq->waitq.lock);
+ return;
+ }
if (list_empty(&req->intr_entry)) {
list_add_tail(&req->intr_entry, &fiq->interrupts);
wake_up_locked(&fiq->waitq);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from stummala@codeaurora.org are
queue-4.9/fuse-fix-use-after-free-issue-in-fuse_dev_do_read.patch
reply other threads:[~2017-02-20 5:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=14875675967374@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=mszeredi@redhat.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stummala@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.