From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Cc: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
osstest service owner <osstest-admin@xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [xen-4.7-testing test] 105948: regressions - FAIL
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 10:59:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1487757588.6732.428.camel@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58AD5DDA020000780013C9ED@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2636 bytes --]
On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 01:46 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > On 22.02.17 at 01:02, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
> > (XEN) Xen call trace:
> > (XEN) [<ffff82d080126e70>]
> > sched_credit2.c#vcpu_is_migrateable+0x22/0x9a
> > (XEN) [<ffff82d080129763>]
> > sched_credit2.c#csched2_schedule+0x823/0xb4e
> > (XEN) [<ffff82d08012c17e>] schedule.c#schedule+0x108/0x609
> > (XEN) [<ffff82d08012f8bd>] softirq.c#__do_softirq+0x7f/0x8a
> > (XEN) [<ffff82d08012f912>] do_softirq+0x13/0x15
> > (XEN) [<ffff82d080164b17>] domain.c#idle_loop+0x55/0x62
> > (XEN)
> > (XEN)
> > (XEN) ****************************************
> > (XEN) Panic on CPU 14:
> > (XEN) Assertion 'd->cpupool != NULL' failed at
> > ...5948.build-amd64/xen/xen/include/xen/sched-if.h:200
> > (XEN) ****************************************
> > (XEN)
> > (XEN) Manual reset required ('noreboot' specified)
> >
> > I am guessing the most recent credit2 backports weren't quite so
> > safe?
>
> Well, there was only one in the batch under test (and that is what
> adds the cpupool_domain_cpumask() causing the ASSERT() above
> to trigger). However, comparing with the staging version of the file
> (which is heavily different), the immediate code involved here isn't
> all that different, so I wonder whether (a) this is a problem on
> staging too or (b) we're missing another backport.
>
Yeah, I also wonder in which of these two situations we are. Staging
looks fine, as far as my testing goes, and also according, e.g., to:
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/105946/test-amd64-amd64-xl-credit2/info.html
Or:
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/105900/test-amd64-amd64-xl-credit2/info.html
There appear to have been a problem, in a different test step, though,
here:
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/105919/test-amd64-amd64-xl-credit2/info.html
Which I noticed yesterday afternoon and am currently looking into it,
because I don't see what has actually gone wrong.
Also, looking at the history of Credit2 tests in 4.7-testing:
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/history/test-amd64-amd64-xl-credit2/xen-4.7-testing
Things were fine on 2017-02-16, and have started failing 2017-02-20.
> Dario?
>
I will investigate.
Thanks and Regards,
Dario
--
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 127 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-22 10:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-21 23:45 [xen-4.7-testing test] 105948: regressions - FAIL osstest service owner
2017-02-22 0:02 ` Andrew Cooper
2017-02-22 8:46 ` Jan Beulich
2017-02-22 9:59 ` Dario Faggioli [this message]
2017-02-23 23:25 ` Dario Faggioli
2017-02-24 16:14 ` RFC/PATCH: xen: race during domain destruction [Re: [xen-4.7-testing test] 105948: regressions - FAIL] Dario Faggioli
2017-02-26 15:53 ` Dario Faggioli
2017-02-27 15:18 ` Dario Faggioli
2017-02-28 9:48 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1487757588.6732.428.camel@citrix.com \
--to=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=osstest-admin@xenproject.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.