From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 6391475391095111680 X-Received: by 10.13.224.70 with SMTP id j67mr5407009ywe.44.1488146217297; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 13:56:57 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.157.35.28 with SMTP id j28ls12097796otb.40.gmail; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 13:56:56 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.129.42.215 with SMTP id q206mr5208607ywq.164.1488146216965; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 13:56:56 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from smtprelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0099.hostedemail.com. [216.40.44.99]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 13si1433128iti.0.2017.02.26.13.56.56 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 26 Feb 2017 13:56:56 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 216.40.44.99 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of joe@perches.com) client-ip=216.40.44.99; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 216.40.44.99 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of joe@perches.com) smtp.mailfrom=joe@perches.com Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (clb03-v110.bra.tucows.net [216.40.38.60]) by smtprelay08.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0979729DD97; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 21:56:56 +0000 (UTC) X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:973:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1541:1593:1594:1711:1730:1747:1777:1792:2194:2199:2393:2553:2559:2562:2693:2828:2910:2911:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3353:3622:3865:3866:3867:3868:3871:3872:3874:4321:4425:5007:6691:6742:7903:9010:9108:10004:10400:10848:11232:11658:11914:12663:12740:12760:12895:13069:13311:13357:13439:14096:14097:14659:21080:21326:30054:30060:30090:30091,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:1,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: pear72_1f049df283b57 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2888 Received: from XPS-9350 (unknown [47.151.132.55]) (Authenticated sender: joe@perches.com) by omf09.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 21:56:53 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1488146211.9188.10.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH] staging: bcm2835-audio: Fixed spacing around '&' From: Joe Perches To: Julia Lawall Cc: Narcisa Ana Maria Vasile , swarren@wwwdotorg.org, lee@kernel.org, eric@anholt.net, f.fainelli@gmail.com, rjui@broadcom.com, sbranden@broadcom.com, daniel.baluta@spamfreegmail.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, mzoran@crowfest.net, danielperezdeandres@gmail.com, dan.carpenter@oracle.com, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 13:56:51 -0800 In-Reply-To: References: <1488131271-2908-1-git-send-email-narcisaanamaria12@gmail.com> <1488134072.9188.3.camel@perches.com> <1488137824.9188.7.camel@perches.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.3-0ubuntu0.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sun, 2017-02-26 at 20:40 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > On Sun, 26 Feb 2017, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Sun, 2017-02-26 at 19:59 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > > > On Sun, 26 Feb 2017, Joe Perches wrot > > > > Mailing lists _should_ be copied on patch submissions. > > > The idea of outreachy is that it should be a place for people to get > > > started without too much criticism from the outside. Originally, only the > > > outreachy mailing list received patches. But staging maintainers were > > > confused to have their drivers receiving patches that they had not seen. > > > So we expanded it to maintainers. > > > > That also doesn't make much sense as patches > > should not be applied that have not reached > > a mailing list for review. > > > > As long as initial outreachy patches are not > > applied and are just for internal review by > > any outside person but the outreachy list and > > are not be applied by maintainers, then perhaps > > it's best if neither maintainers nor lists are > > cc'd on the patches. > > The patches are applied by Greg. Greg suggested the policy of adding > maintainers but not including mailing lists. I'll let him consider > whether the policy should be changed. Well, I will comment on patches sent to the kernel list. I'm not subscribed to outreachy and I don't want to be subscribed to that list either. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: joe@perches.com (Joe Perches) Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 13:56:51 -0800 Subject: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH] staging: bcm2835-audio: Fixed spacing around '&' In-Reply-To: References: <1488131271-2908-1-git-send-email-narcisaanamaria12@gmail.com> <1488134072.9188.3.camel@perches.com> <1488137824.9188.7.camel@perches.com> Message-ID: <1488146211.9188.10.camel@perches.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sun, 2017-02-26 at 20:40 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > On Sun, 26 Feb 2017, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Sun, 2017-02-26 at 19:59 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > > > On Sun, 26 Feb 2017, Joe Perches wrot > > > > Mailing lists _should_ be copied on patch submissions. > > > The idea of outreachy is that it should be a place for people to get > > > started without too much criticism from the outside. Originally, only the > > > outreachy mailing list received patches. But staging maintainers were > > > confused to have their drivers receiving patches that they had not seen. > > > So we expanded it to maintainers. > > > > That also doesn't make much sense as patches > > should not be applied that have not reached > > a mailing list for review. > > > > As long as initial outreachy patches are not > > applied and are just for internal review by > > any outside person but the outreachy list and > > are not be applied by maintainers, then perhaps > > it's best if neither maintainers nor lists are > > cc'd on the patches. > > The patches are applied by Greg. Greg suggested the policy of adding > maintainers but not including mailing lists. I'll let him consider > whether the policy should be changed. Well, I will comment on patches sent to the kernel list. I'm not subscribed to outreachy and I don't want to be subscribed to that list either.