From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Berg Subject: Re: HE (11ax) extensions Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 08:28:05 +0100 Message-ID: <1488266885.2388.0.camel@sipsolutions.net> References: <1486992211.19813.1.camel@sipsolutions.net> <1487162908.31885.1.camel@sipsolutions.net> <1487764486.2215.5.camel@sipsolutions.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1487764486.2215.5.camel-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org> Sender: radiotap-owner-sUITvd46vNxg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org To: radiotap-S783fYmB3Ccdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org List-Id: radiotap@radiotap.org On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 12:54 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > Anyway, that proposal missed a number of things and didn't really > make any sense, here's a new one: > > http://www.radiotap.org/fields/HE > http://www.radiotap.org/fields/HE-MU-common > http://www.radiotap.org/fields/HE-MU-user FWIW, I've not pursued this further for now since the spec is still a moving target. I'm told HE-SIG-B is fairly stable, but HE-SIG-A is still a heavily contended topic (at least some parts of it) johannes